![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been doing a good bit of reading lately (always do right after Christmas as my family finally listens and gets me some of the selected reading material on my "list") and in reading 2 of Eric Hammel's books Aces Against Germany and Aces Against Japan, I've realized that recoil from firing all your guns at once was a real concern for many (especially in low-speed combat on the deck) because the recoil was so pronounced that it could actually contribute to a severe stall.
One pilot of a P-51 stated that firing all 6 guns was the equivalent of reducing horsepower by 400! This brings me to a somewhat rhetorical question with 2 parts; A. To what extent is this phenomenon modelled in IL2? and B. How well do you think it will be modelled in newer-gen sims like SoW and RoF? I realize any answers to these questions will be speculative as the ones equipped to answer them accurately likely won't/can't respond. Nonetheless, I'm interested to find out. TB |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Somewhat, maybe not that much, but I remember firing in a I16/24 with one of the SHVAK disabled by enemy fire, and it did tend to turn you toward the firing gun, which made achieving hits much more difficult. That was a while ago, maybe in the original FB, I couldn't swear it still happens now, but it could be that it does, I don't remember having a wing cannon disabled recently.
Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Recoil is modelled in il2, a standing 110 rolls backward when you fire the guns.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Gun recoil is modeled in Il2. As already stated, if you loose one wing cannon, your aircraft will slip to that side when firing.
Another and even better test is to land your plane, shut down the engine, and fire your guns. You will start to roll backwards. Of course this is more pronounced on the larger guns. I would think that any and all effects present in Il2 (and many new ones) will be improved and implemented in SoW. Edit...Sorry robtek. I see you already mentioned this.
__________________
STRIKE HOLD!!! Nulla Vestigia Retrorsum |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I realize it's modelled in IL2, but is it even close to the equivalent of reducing the effective horsepower on a P-51 by 25%? My experiences are that it's more of a shooting issue than an actual FM issue, even at low altitudes in a stall fight. I've lost a cannon or even a bank of guns on one side and had the resultant yaw skew my marksmanship enough to realize there is something there but firing my guns (even a pair of MK108's) in a low scissor doesn't seem to affect my forward momentum or contribute to one of my wings dropping off from lack of lift.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As pure speculation, I doubt that the actual recoil of even 6 .50 cals is that great. I'm sure it is significant but compared to the inertia of a several thousand pound aircraft, I'd estimate the effects to be on the more conservative side. IMHO I'd say IL2 has got it pretty close.
That said I would be interested in some more scientific calculations. I'm definitely not the man for that job. ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Now, think to all the vertical fights that we do where the lower plan points if nose up ad fires even if a 150Km/h. The recoil is modelled, but so much...
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
![]() |
|
|