Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-14-2009, 05:30 PM
Thunderbolt56 Thunderbolt56 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 398
Default Modelling the effects of gun-recoil

I've been doing a good bit of reading lately (always do right after Christmas as my family finally listens and gets me some of the selected reading material on my "list") and in reading 2 of Eric Hammel's books Aces Against Germany and Aces Against Japan, I've realized that recoil from firing all your guns at once was a real concern for many (especially in low-speed combat on the deck) because the recoil was so pronounced that it could actually contribute to a severe stall.

One pilot of a P-51 stated that firing all 6 guns was the equivalent of reducing horsepower by 400!

This brings me to a somewhat rhetorical question with 2 parts;

A. To what extent is this phenomenon modelled in IL2?

and

B. How well do you think it will be modelled in newer-gen sims like SoW and RoF?


I realize any answers to these questions will be speculative as the ones equipped to answer them accurately likely won't/can't respond. Nonetheless, I'm interested to find out.

TB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2009, 09:27 PM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt56 View Post
A. To what extent is this phenomenon modelled in IL2?
Somewhat, maybe not that much, but I remember firing in a I16/24 with one of the SHVAK disabled by enemy fire, and it did tend to turn you toward the firing gun, which made achieving hits much more difficult. That was a while ago, maybe in the original FB, I couldn't swear it still happens now, but it could be that it does, I don't remember having a wing cannon disabled recently.

Quote:
B. How well do you think it will be modelled in newer-gen sims like SoW and RoF?
That is entirely up to the developer. All other things being equal, which they never are, I'd prefer it was, but I don't know what I'd be prepared to give up in order to have it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2009, 09:44 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Recoil is modelled in il2, a standing 110 rolls backward when you fire the guns.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-14-2009, 10:00 PM
choctaw111's Avatar
choctaw111 choctaw111 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 462
Default

Gun recoil is modeled in Il2. As already stated, if you loose one wing cannon, your aircraft will slip to that side when firing.
Another and even better test is to land your plane, shut down the engine, and fire your guns. You will start to roll backwards. Of course this is more pronounced on the larger guns.
I would think that any and all effects present in Il2 (and many new ones) will be improved and implemented in SoW.

Edit...Sorry robtek. I see you already mentioned this.
__________________
STRIKE HOLD!!!
Nulla Vestigia Retrorsum
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-15-2009, 11:51 AM
Thunderbolt56 Thunderbolt56 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 398
Default

I realize it's modelled in IL2, but is it even close to the equivalent of reducing the effective horsepower on a P-51 by 25%? My experiences are that it's more of a shooting issue than an actual FM issue, even at low altitudes in a stall fight. I've lost a cannon or even a bank of guns on one side and had the resultant yaw skew my marksmanship enough to realize there is something there but firing my guns (even a pair of MK108's) in a low scissor doesn't seem to affect my forward momentum or contribute to one of my wings dropping off from lack of lift.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-15-2009, 01:26 PM
BadAim BadAim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 984
Default

As pure speculation, I doubt that the actual recoil of even 6 .50 cals is that great. I'm sure it is significant but compared to the inertia of a several thousand pound aircraft, I'd estimate the effects to be on the more conservative side. IMHO I'd say IL2 has got it pretty close.

That said I would be interested in some more scientific calculations. I'm definitely not the man for that job.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-21-2009, 11:34 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt56 View Post
I realize it's modelled in IL2, but is it even close to the equivalent of reducing the effective horsepower on a P-51 by 25%? My experiences are that it's more of a shooting issue than an actual FM issue, even at low altitudes in a stall fight. I've lost a cannon or even a bank of guns on one side and had the resultant yaw skew my marksmanship enough to realize there is something there but firing my guns (even a pair of MK108's) in a low scissor doesn't seem to affect my forward momentum or contribute to one of my wings dropping off from lack of lift.
I read a P51 pilot's account where he states you could no fire at low speed since the recoil could make you stall. Probably it's the same pilot that you describe here.

Now, think to all the vertical fights that we do where the lower plan points if nose up ad fires even if a 150Km/h.

The recoil is modelled, but so much...
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.