![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is not a rant in any way, as we are most certainly divided. I was just thinking about this the other day...on how certain releases have torn apart folks that have a common interest.
One of the bigger ones I can remember was the release of Flanker 2.0. I was at Combatsim at the time and there were battles going on that were mostly Flanker vs. Falcon arguments. Whats my point? Not sure I have one really...just seems different here and the battle has been going on longer than some real wars. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Look at the the stats here (only 20 guys actually answered to the questions, thanks guys!) http://www.diavolirossi.net/manu/cfs/main.php "Us" who?
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-20-2012 at 02:55 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok...your going to have to explain this. What did I do to harm a survey I've never heard of?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Typo issue!! Edited.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-20-2012 at 02:54 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So your saying there is no such thing as a flight sim community based on some obscure survey (that you created?) that 99.99% of flight simmers have never heard of? Sounds like a case of hurt feelings more than anything else.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I've never flown in an arcade server, that's 2/3 HL was made of at the time. And the "full difficulty" servers I flew in were the ones without external views. So I'm part of a little IL2 community, a single rib of the global IL2 community. So IMO the CloD is not dividing those communities.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Answer to original question = Yes
Title of Game = il2 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just saw this thread and immediately the same answer Ze-Jamz already gave came to my mind. Oh the memories...
![]()
__________________
Intel Core i7-2600K 3,4GHz, cooled by SCYTHE Mugen III ASUS P8Z68-V PRO Corsair Vengeance 8GB PC3-1280 Gainward GeForce GTX 580 Phantom 3GB GDD CRUCIAL SSD 128GB M4 + Samsung EcoGreen F4 2000GB SATA II Creative SB X-Fi Titanium MS SW FFB2 + CH-Pro Throttle/Pedals TrackIR 3 + Vector Expansion (drv. 5.1.3) + Charvel's profile Samsung Syncmaster 240T (1920x1200) win7 ult 64bit |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey guys can anyone find that picture where there are small pictures of the comunity members interlaced around an Oleg picture?
I was trying to find it but couldnt
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
![]() |
|
|