![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guys, I think we got to a stage here where we need to understand what we want: do we want something that looks life-like (cos that's the direction they've finally taken) or do we want something that is a bit cartoonish for the sake of comfort?
If you fly in a plane at midday you might struggle to see the instruments, the eye will need to cope with sunlight and can't do two jobs at the time (sunglasses for pilots are not just a fashion item). What they're trying to deliver here is the best representation of what things look like in real life, before moaning about it play with your gamma, contrast and brightness settings, let's try to be sensible. Uh and another thing: don't post stuff like "please fix this or that", it sounds like everything is broken! Choose your words carefully ("my experience with this x feature is..") if you want to be listened to, it also really helps keeping the good spirits up! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree. And remember I'm the chief moaner here so leave that to me, ok!?
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Landscape looks good, maybe cockpit needs to be half and half
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
whetever we say or not
it seems that the dev's already decided what to do ![]() again for some people who lives in England the curently colours of the landscape is crap.. for others is good for others is-LCD trip-- same with cockpits personally i don't like the contrast of the pits cause loosing a lot of details i don't care about RL I care about detail the only thing wanna see as close as it gets is the physics and FM Of the aircrafts IMHO -S- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To be honest I'm deeply confused about this whole color discussion. Don't get me wrong...I believe that there is room for improvement. I just fail to see the importance of it considering the state of the sim. For me personally there are many matters which are way more important (stutters, performance, AI, dynamic campaign, dynamic weather). But there are a million threads about colors and almost none about the other issues. I'm confused.
Alexander |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You always are going to be discussing about so so things, not about what everybody agree.
__________________
Win 7 64 Quad core 4Gb ram GTX 560 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think my head just exploded.
So really you don't care about the details, you care about your vision of how things should look, real or not. Perhaps a PS3 or Xbox would be more satisfying for your play style. ![]()
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
now tell me
which from the above pics is detailed as real as it gets if one of those is closed to England terrain then i will explode myself |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WOW, the SAS textures, this is something !!!
|
![]() |
|
|