How to do it

klem · #1 09-14-2011, 07:44 AM

http://www.a2asimulations.com/forum/...=26491&start=0

if only MG had the time and aircraft available.

pupo162 · #2 09-14-2011, 08:53 AM

well, they could pull a similar trick on some russian planes. They should be aviailable there. some yaks and stuff.

robtek · #3 09-14-2011, 09:56 AM

The complex simulation of the A2A Aircraft, combined with CoD landscape and damage modelling....
That would be Dreams coming true!!
At least for me!

Sutts · #4 09-14-2011, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robtek

The complex simulation of the A2A Aircraft, combined with CoD landscape and damage modelling....
That would be Dreams coming true!!
At least for me!

I totally agree. Unfortunately when I enquired they told me they had no intention of developing for any other simulation product.

Blackdog_kt · #5 09-14-2011, 05:27 PM

I like their products but i think expecting that kind of quality in a survey sim is an unfair comparison: buying just one of their planes + the accusim pack (no terrain/environment and no DM, just the planes and their systems modeling) costs about as much as CoD.

That's how they can afford to do it. I'm not saying it's bad, they're very good and i've had the pleasure of flying some of their add-ons on a friend's PC, it's just that i find the comparison a bit too "apples and oranges" for my taste.

Ze-Jamz · #6 09-14-2011, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt

I like their products but i think expecting that kind of quality in a survey sim is an unfair comparison: buying just one of their planes + the accusim pack (no terrain/environment and no DM, just the planes and their systems modeling) costs about as much as CoD.

That's how they can afford to do it. I'm not saying it's bad, they're very good and i've had the pleasure of flying some of their add-ons on a friend's PC, it's just that i find the comparison a bit too "apples and oranges" for my taste.

Agreed..

There shouldnt be or cant be any comparison between that and CoD..

As BD said, they can solely concentrate on the Model, they dont have to worry about anything else ingame and yes they get paid for it...quite well in fact

klem · #7 09-14-2011, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt

I like their products but i think expecting that kind of quality in a survey sim is an unfair comparison: buying just one of their planes + the accusim pack (no terrain/environment and no DM, just the planes and their systems modeling) costs about as much as CoD.

That's how they can afford to do it. I'm not saying it's bad, they're very good and i've had the pleasure of flying some of their add-ons on a friend's PC, it's just that i find the comparison a bit too "apples and oranges" for my taste.

It wasn't really a comparison, it was a "wouldn't it be nice". Can't really expect that much dev for all the planes that are or will be in CoD.

It is impressive. I have the Spit I and II, they fly beautifully. Looking forward to the P51D very much.

Ze-Jamz · #8 09-14-2011, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klem

http://www.a2asimulations.com/forum/...=26491&start=0

if only MG had the time and aircraft available.

Agreed..

Nice find Klem

LoBiSoMeM · #9 09-14-2011, 10:45 AM

How they will handle damage model and model the weapons system? If A2A can do it well, I will buy any addon from this great company if MG release SDK to commercial third part addons for CloD.

Phazon · #10 09-14-2011, 10:58 AM

That's pretty impressive. Definately agreed on the comments he made in regards to sound. I don't actually have FSX but I might have to pick it up to play with these addons as they look great.

You can't really compare IL-2 and this in a fair manner though. IL-2 has to make some concessions to be able to simulate actual combat with realistically sized squadrons.