![]() |
|
Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
UPDATED 2011-05-04 as I got all my new stuff....
Hi! Below is a rather interesting study of what affects CoD performance. Used my old rig, my old rig with my new GPU and finally my new rig... The "rules": * CoD settings to "default" high settings with no AA, SSAO or anti epilepsy. * Start the Fraps benchmark as soon as the track has started, and stop it the second the track is done. Don't forget to turn off "Stop benchmark after 60 seconds"! * I used 1680x1050 resolution - so set that for correct comparison! On my old system I got this: Core2Duo E8400@3.3 - GTX275 - 6 GB DDR2 800Mhz - P45Mb Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 6851, 218058, 9, 69, 31.418 My old rig with my new GPU - only gained 1.9 fps in average! Sure CPU limited - the weird thing is that both cores are never above 70% load, most of the time at ~30-60% Core2Duo E8400@3.3 - GTX580 - 6 GB DDR2 800Mhz - P45Mb Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 7230, 217293, 13, 70, 33.273 And then - my new rig in full glory (same GFX card as above): i7 2600k @ 4.5 - GTX580 - 8 GB DDR3 1600Mhz - P67 Mb Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 14867, 216997, 22, 168, 68.512 All on Windows 7 x64 Anyone else with a score to share according to the "rules" above? Last edited by mazex; 05-13-2011 at 07:16 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're going to clock that to 4.5ghz remember to disable HT in the BIOS or you'll have temp problems. Disable HT anyway, it's rubbish in games and bugger all real use anywhere else unless you're a professional image/footage/music editor or sumthin.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was why I went for the 2500k, spending the extra for a feature that I'd never use AND would cause issues in getting a good OC didn't make a lot of sense (though I was tempted for the reasons you give). The extra cache doesn't make any difference either according to benchmarks. The onboard graphics are a waste too, don't know what Intel were thinking of with that.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had Min 19 Max 152 everything Maxed , SSAO turned off 1920x1200 res
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sounds good! And the average?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This will be an interesting thread and am looking forward to reading more.
__________________
STRIKE HOLD!!! Nulla Vestigia Retrorsum |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using your settings above, (1900x1080)
Min-0 Avg-31 Max-93 Intel dual core@3ghz Ati 5870 4 gig ram wind 7 64-bit Last edited by Rattlehead; 05-02-2011 at 08:56 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know,I registered the Min and Max looking at the screen,but I need to learn where the damn fraps is storing the data from benchmark.
What's the correct setting to do the MinAvgMax reading? EDIT:Both Min and Max readings was there for a second,mostly of the time it's around 76 fps, when the Bf 110 are aproaching to atack,48 fps more or less,the bombs exploding around 30 or something Last edited by lbuchele; 05-02-2011 at 11:15 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() using a Noctua NH-D14 air cooler and Obsidian 650D chassis.
__________________
i7 2600k @ 4.5 | GTX580 1.5GB (latest drivers) | P8Z77-V Pro MB | 8GB DDR3 1600 Mhz | SSD (OS) + Raptor 150 (Games) + 1TB WD (Extra) | X-Fi Fatality Pro (PCI) | Windows 7 x64 | TrackIR 4 | G940 Hotas |
![]() |
|
|