![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just an observation but I find the Stuka is difficult to shoot down. My loadout is 2xincendiary tracers and 6xarmor piercing.
I can saw the wings off larger bombers with relative ease and do tremendous other damage - but not the Stuka. Is it just possible that the damage model is not up to snuff on this bird? My understanding is that the Stuka was pretty easy game for the Hurri's. Any comments? Cheers |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kill the crew and they go right down
__________________
MSI P67A-65D Intel i5 2500K @ 4.2 Gig 8 Gigs Corsair DDR3 1600 RAM XFX 6970 Video Card Win7 64 Bit Home Ed ATI 12.3 Driver Package WD Caviar 7600 RPM HDD ATI CCC at DEFAULT settings |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So I take it the engine and fuel tanks aren't as vulnerable in Cliffs as they were in IL-2 1946?
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yes well
Rudel probably wouldnt have racked up over 2500 missions if the stuka was a *Ronson* ![]() he always praised his mighty steed,as being able to take alot of damage and still get him home. then again,he was shot down a dozen times.heh sinking the Marat must've been an incredible sight,let alone being the one responsible for it! the story is quite a good one,and very lucky to actually have pulled it off. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He grounded the Marat. Nails all the same but the thing wasn't sunk.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, he sunk the Marat as far as it could go down!
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If this is the A10 of WWII, I'm wondering how the Hurri's and Spit's managed to down so many? Just a thought: I wonder if the statistics for downing the Stuka's in increased volume happened after the introduction of the Hispano 20 mm.? But I do so love the damage on larger bombers. To me it is so similar to the camera footage shown so many times of BOB IRL. Cheers Last edited by Catseye; 04-28-2011 at 03:54 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Try to hit the radiator from behind/underneath, works in IL-2 1946. The IL-2 Sturmovik had the same weakness, hit that thing and you're set
![]()
__________________
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They are difficult to flame and the hardest I have come across. I was testing my convergence (absolutley critical) and found that aiming for the fuel tanks by swooping under and upwards, chopping throttle, was the only way I could rupture them and ignite. Even then, it doesn't always work (in terms of 'flaming') , the AI drop so his rear gunner has you in his sights again but hit the engine from below and down they go. (De-Wilde and AP load out)
From what I have read, the Ju87 was withdrawn from operational use in the BoB due to high losses- something isn't right with the current damage modelling. ![]() Last edited by SEE; 04-28-2011 at 04:39 PM. |
![]() |
|
|