Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2011, 02:43 PM
Biggs Biggs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 351
Default A question for bf109 'experten'

so I came across a couple pics of an Emil that took me by surprise. there is something odd about the wing armament configuration, it appears to have 2 access ports for mgs/cannon, instead of the more customary single wing cannon port.

can any of you tell me what variant this is an how common it was during the war.

heres a BoB emil at the imperial war museum: note 2 wing ports.


and the second i found was this russian captured Emil... looks to be a later E series (pointed nose cone)... one port being occupied by a cannon, the other an MG?


what gives?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2011, 03:05 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

the inner holes were used when the wing had the E-1 armament, means MG17 instead of MG-FF.
the idea was to ease the production.....as E-1 and E-3 (at least) were produced during the same time.
Its like the universal SpitfireMk.V C wing.

if you look closer at canon armed Emil pictures from the front you see that these inner holed are just faired over.

the spinner says nothing about how old the aircraft was or what version it is btw

Last edited by JG53Frankyboy; 02-14-2011 at 03:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2011, 03:31 PM
Biggs Biggs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
the inner holes were used when the wing had the E-1 armament, means MG17 instead of MG-FF.
the idea was to ease the production.....as E-1 and E-3 (at least) were produced during the same time.
Its like the universal SpitfireMk.V C wing.

if you look closer at canon armed Emil pictures from the front you see that these inner holed are just faired over.

the spinner says nothing about how old the aircraft was or what version it is btw
so the E1 had 2 mg17s in each wing? or just one with the cannon port open?....

and about the cone... what variants got the open spinner and which got the pointed?

thanks btw
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-14-2011, 03:43 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggs View Post
so the E1 had 2 mg17s in each wing? or just one with the cannon port open?....

and about the cone... what variants got the open spinner and which got the pointed?

thanks btw
no, the 109E-1 had an armament of ONE MG17 (500rounds) in each wing - no canons at all. So, 4xMG17 in total (2xfuselage, 2xwing).
The wing MG17 were shooting through the inner holes. The outer canonholes were than faired over and there was no bulge (needed for the ammodrum of the canon) below the wing.

the pointed spinner was first inroduced with the E-7, but was interchangeable with the earlier spinner
the soviet captured 109E looks like a Fighterbomber of a Schlachtgeschwader, hence its SC50 ETC under the fuselage.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-14-2011, 03:49 PM
Biggs Biggs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
no, the 109E-1 had an armament of ONE MG17 (500rounds) in each wing - no canons at all. So, 4xMG17 in total (2xfuselage, 2xwing).
The wing MG17 were shooting through the inner holes. The outer canonholes were than faired over and there was no bulge (needed for the ammodrum of the canon) below the wing.

the pointed spinner was first inroduced with the E-7, but was interchangeable with the earlier spinner
the soviet captured 109E looks like a Fighterbomber of a Schlachtgeschwader, hence its SC50 ETC under the fuselage.
gracias aigo!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-14-2011, 03:56 PM
Rodolphe's Avatar
Rodolphe Rodolphe is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 208
Default

...

FYI





...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-14-2011, 09:36 PM
WTE_Galway WTE_Galway is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodolphe View Post
...

FYI





...


Of course in the E4 the the MG-FF wing cannon were replaced with the externally identical MG-FF/M cannon. The MG-FF/M had a different recoil mechanism allowing a higher RoF and allowing it to fire high-explosive "mine" shells.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.