Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:30 PM
Chips86 Chips86 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 153
Default A cool idea? Maybe..

I was playing around on berlin last night and got to flying along the rivers at breakneck speeds, trying to make it under the bridges [the ones that can only be about ten feet tall] and got to thinking...how farking sweet would it be if a group of us could organise a race around the rivers, having to get under each bridge?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:32 PM
FOZ_1983 FOZ_1983 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Blackpool, England
Posts: 1,997
Default

would need a red bull air race plane lol.

something fast and manouverable.......... yak? spit? 190? b17?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:34 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FOZ_1983 View Post
would need a red bull air race plane lol.

something fast and manouverable.......... yak? spit? 190? b17?
I vote B17 . Flying inverted obviously, with two engines out. Just not to make it too easy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:36 PM
FOZ_1983 FOZ_1983 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Blackpool, England
Posts: 1,997
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient Seraph View Post
I vote B17 . Flying inverted obviously, with two engines out. Just not to make it too easy.

we would have to veto the B17, it would just be to unfair on everyone else who doesnt have it yet,...... even on one engine and inverted the B17 would zip under them bridges with ease and ever so fast........ it wouldnt be any fun or a challenge haha.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:48 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FOZ_1983 View Post
we would have to veto the B17, it would just be to unfair on everyone else who doesnt have it yet,...... even on one engine and inverted the B17 would zip under them bridges with ease and ever so fast........ it wouldnt be any fun or a challenge haha.
Well, people who don't have the B17 could grab a Po-2, seems like somewhat of a fair fight, still out of the league of any other planes though .
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:51 PM
FOZ_1983 FOZ_1983 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Blackpool, England
Posts: 1,997
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient Seraph View Post
Well, people who don't have the B17 could grab a Po-2, seems like somewhat of a fair fight, still out of the league of any other planes though .

good call!! between them though they would have a huge advantage over everything else haha.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.