Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2008, 03:13 PM
Paul Paul is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 38
Default FW-190A4 in combat PDF

Owner's exclusive now available to the public.

http://www.angelsandairspeed.com/php....php?f=1&t=154
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-25-2008, 04:16 PM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Interesting, I liked most of it.

Calling the 109 a turn fighter seems to be stretching the definition a bit. I thought in any furball, one side had the energy fighters and the other the turn fighters (supposing no more than one type per side) and most of the time, the 109 was the energy fighter.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-25-2008, 04:37 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Been an energy fighter or not it's relative to your opponent.

FW190 against Spitfire => the FW190 is the energy fighter.

Spitfire against Cr42 => the Spitfire is the energy fighter.

Cr42 against Gladiator => the Cr42 is the energy fighter.

In any plane you can energy fight.

Infact you can use the same FW190's tactics flying an Hurricane against a I153.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2008, 02:55 AM
Paul Paul is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igo kyu View Post
Interesting, I liked most of it.

Calling the 109 a turn fighter seems to be stretching the definition a bit. I thought in any furball, one side had the energy fighters and the other the turn fighters (supposing no more than one type per side) and most of the time, the 109 was the energy fighter.
Any aircraft can be used as an energy fighter - but it doesn't mean it is.

The 109 can be used as an energy fighter vs slower aircraft but it was still primarily a turn fighter - albeit a fast one. Big hint is the lighter armament (requiring tracking shots and multiple hits). Later in the series (G and up) it lost that manoeuverability so had to be flown as an energy fighter - it's armament was upgraded for the role but it never had the roll rate that is so handy in vertical manoeuvering.

The 190 was from the start an energy fighter - extremely heavy weaponry (compared to the 109) made it likely that one good pass will take the enemy out - amongst the other features.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2008, 10:33 AM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul View Post
Any aircraft can be used as an energy fighter - but it doesn't mean it is.
Not by design perhaps, but I agree with 6S.Manu that it's all relative.

Quote:
Big hint is the lighter armament (requiring tracking shots and multiple hits).
That does sound about right for the Bf109F, but the Bf109E was more heavily armed, and rolled faster than the Spitfire, so in that context, was the energy fighter of those two.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2008, 12:55 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igo kyu View Post
Not by design perhaps, but I agree with 6S.Manu that it's all relative.


That does sound about right for the Bf109F, but the Bf109E was more heavily armed, and rolled faster than the Spitfire, so in that context, was the energy fighter of those two.
We can say that FW190 was built for speed, so been faster than his opponents in '42 makes it a energy fighter.

About the weapons: 190 was designed with a couple of light MGs plus 2 heavy MG. No cannons.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.

Last edited by 6S.Manu; 11-26-2008 at 03:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-26-2008, 05:37 PM
Paul Paul is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 38
Default

A prototype is a testbed and uses what is available because you can't power an aircraft or arm it with blueprints You also can't do your initial designs with fantasy weaponry.

The A2 production series had 4 mg and 2 20mm cannon - this is the 'service prototype' aircraft - not one designed for flying around a test aerodrome. The only reason it did not have 4 cannon was simply due to availability of the weapon. As more became available the wing mg's were replaced with cannon and later as better cannon became available they started replacing the existing sets.

While a fast aircraft can use energy tactics it might not be able do it effectively. Lack of high speed elevator authority (in the case of most turn fighters), lack of high speed roll rate (once again common to turn fighters) and lack of armament that can take an aircraft out in one pass will all reduce the aircraft's effectiveness. The 109 series suffered from the roll and elevator problems but had sufficient armament to allow some energy tactics to be used but it never was the aircraft's forte. It was simply not maneouvrable enough at high speed.

The 190 was designed for the energy fight right from scratch and suffered none of the above problems.

The most common mistake people make when talking about energy fighters is equating 'fast' to being 'fast and at its most manoeuvrable at high speed'.

Last edited by Paul; 11-26-2008 at 05:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.