Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-06-2012, 08:52 AM
Anders_And Anders_And is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 247
Default New patch: is the Processaffinity mask the reason for mixed results??

The new patch is to use all four cores or rather more cores than now. Has anyone been able to confirm this? My four cores seem to be at the same load as before...

Now, I seem to remember a long time ago that Luthier said we could experiment with the Processaffinity mask setting in the conf.ini (tells the game which cores to use for game play) and maybe this is the reason for these mixed results across these boards??? This change in the conf.ini was made before this patch obviously and for those who did change the Processaffinity mask settings (me included) this new patch will seem to give less FPS maybe??!.. Can this be the reason for the mixed results on the boards here?

Some people here are claiming alot higher FPS and others, me included have alot less FPS

I remember that I changed something in the conf.ini for the Processaffinity mask. Maybe I should revert back to the original setting in there but I just cannot remember what the original number was?!? Anyone??

So for people with FPS increase what is your ProcessAffinity mask setting in the conf.ini??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-06-2012, 08:57 AM
Buchon Buchon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

The reason behind the differences in performance reports are under my opinion :

- Dual cores / Quad cores.

- 1 GB card / above of 1 GB.

Because the key of the patch is the multicore optimization (CPU) in the graphic engine and the new texture management (GPU memory).

But yes, is recommended remove the affinity configuration, it is not used by default in the game.

Last edited by Buchon; 05-06-2012 at 09:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-2012, 08:59 AM
janpitor janpitor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 122
Default

Hi, i am not at my pc, so I didn´t try yet, but id would be a good idea to remove afinity mask from conf.iny and then try the patch.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:02 AM
FG28_Kodiak FG28_Kodiak is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Swabia->Bavaria->Germany
Posts: 884
Default

I have a big fps boost. AMD Phenom II X4 3.2GHz. Ati 5770.
;ProcessAffinityMask=15
is out commented. So default.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:06 AM
simast simast is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FG28_Kodiak View Post
I have a big fps boost. AMD Phenom II X4 3.2GHz. Ati 5770.
Interesting. I am also on Phenom II X4 (3.4 GHz) and with a different NVIDIA card (no ProcessAffinityMask in config) - and I have no FPS boost whatsoever. So clearly, FPS issues are graphics card related.
__________________
Windows 7 64-bit | AMD Phenom II X4 3.4 GHz | GeForce GTX 460 1Gb | 8 GB RAM | SSD | Track IR 5
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:11 AM
janpitor janpitor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simast View Post
Interesting. I am also on Phenom II X4 (3.4 GHz) and with a different NVIDIA card (no ProcessAffinityMask in config) - and I have no FPS boost whatsoever. So clearly, FPS issues are graphics card related.
It could mean you are already limited by graphics settings. I have to check when I come back. Because previously I could reduce the settings to minimum and FPS would´t be better. I hope this is improved and I will see an FPS difference between graphics settings.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:11 AM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

I asked Luthier directly about multicore support in the new graphics engine. He said 4 cores or more CPU's should see considerable improvement in FPS, dual cores will also see improvements just not as big as if you have 4+ cores. There is nothing in the patch notes about altering the conf.ini ProcessAffinity line and why should there be? It's a modern game engine, it's supposed to automatically detect how many cores are available and use them, I don't think ProcessAffinity does anything ATM.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:18 AM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

AA which seems to work now may be a reason for mixed results also.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:21 AM
simast simast is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by janpitor View Post
It could mean you are already limited by graphics settings. I have to check when I come back. Because previously I could reduce the settings to minimum and FPS would´t be better. I hope this is improved and I will see an FPS difference between graphics settings.
The thing is that Radeon 5770 is supposed to be worse than GeForce GTX 460.
See: http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html
__________________
Windows 7 64-bit | AMD Phenom II X4 3.4 GHz | GeForce GTX 460 1Gb | 8 GB RAM | SSD | Track IR 5
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:38 AM
Ailantd's Avatar
Ailantd Ailantd is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 290
Default

I have a quad core and I have not experienced any improvement.
__________________
Win 7 64
Quad core
4Gb ram
GTX 560
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.