Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-23-2011, 03:14 PM
jamesdietz's Avatar
jamesdietz jamesdietz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle,WashingtonUSA
Posts: 758
Default Its still FPS...

Newest Beta has really improved several aspects of game play,but my FPS flying low over land is still quite low10-12 FPS while over water a more playable at 24-30 FPS.New beta seems to have smoothed thing up a bit ,but at these FPS AI is till twitchy,and hard to draw a bead on.Also FPS suffers when mirrors are on ( just like Il-2 did) and when I zoom in on gunsight view.From what I've read this is a difficult issue to change & may take a while to solve. Righr now I've set my PC on maximum performance ( as opposed to Gameplay) and am using "GameBooster as well.Does anyone else have any other suggestions on how I might get another 10-20 FPS out of what I've got? Get a new Graphics card - is there something reasonably priced?) or just be patient & wait for Ubisoft to solve this issue?
Love the sim...but FPS is the main issue right now for me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-23-2011, 03:18 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdietz View Post
Newest Beta has really improved several aspects of game play,but my FPS flying low over land is still quite low10-12 FPS while over water a more playable at 24-30 FPS.New beta seems to have smoothed thing up a bit ,but at these FPS AI is till twitchy,and hard to draw a bead on.Also FPS suffers when mirrors are on ( just like Il-2 did) and when I zoom in on gunsight view.From what I've read this is a difficult issue to change & may take a while to solve. Righr now I've set my PC on maximum performance ( as opposed to Gameplay) and am using "GameBooster as well.Does anyone else have any other suggestions on how I might get another 10-20 FPS out of what I've got? Get a new Graphics card - is there something reasonably priced?) or just be patient & wait for Ubisoft to solve this issue?
Love the sim...but FPS is the main issue right now for me.
Well if you want some advise on getting advise id post your current system specs mate
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-23-2011, 03:25 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdietz View Post
Newest Beta has really improved several aspects of game play,but my FPS flying low over land is still quite low10-12 FPS while over water a more playable at 24-30 FPS.New beta seems to have smoothed thing up a bit ,but at these FPS AI is till twitchy,and hard to draw a bead on.Also FPS suffers when mirrors are on ( just like Il-2 did) and when I zoom in on gunsight view.From what I've read this is a difficult issue to change & may take a while to solve. Righr now I've set my PC on maximum performance ( as opposed to Gameplay) and am using "GameBooster as well.Does anyone else have any other suggestions on how I might get another 10-20 FPS out of what I've got? Get a new Graphics card - is there something reasonably priced?) or just be patient & wait for Ubisoft to solve this issue?
Love the sim...but FPS is the main issue right now for me.
This patch did not change FPS it just cleared up some of the other problems they are still working on a patch to increase FPS but it wont be ready for another month or two.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-23-2011, 03:39 PM
jamesdietz's Avatar
jamesdietz jamesdietz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle,WashingtonUSA
Posts: 758
Default

Sorry meant to include:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7CPU
950@ 3.07GHz 3.06GHz
RAM16.0GB
Windows7 64bit
Nvidia GeForce9800GT
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-23-2011, 03:43 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdietz View Post
Sorry meant to include:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7CPU
950@ 3.07GHz 3.06GHz
RAM16.0GB
Windows7 64bit
Nvidia GeForce9800GT
Your GPU is what's holding you back.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-23-2011, 05:35 PM
Lixma Lixma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 201
Default

It's not so much the FPS as the stuttering for me.

I can turn everything down low, turn trees off etc...etc and it still judders horribly when I'm anywhere near buildings.

My FPS is fine/appropriate at all detail levels....but the stuttering is down to something wonky in the engine.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-23-2011, 05:49 PM
Skiiwa Skiiwa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 88
Default

its your vid card. All my specs are lower except my GTX 460.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-23-2011, 05:56 PM
335th_GRAthos 335th_GRAthos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,240
Default

What did a nice system like this
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdietz View Post
Sorry meant to include:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7CPU
950@ 3.07GHz 3.06GHz
RAM16.0GB
Windows7 64bit
do, in order to deserver a graphics card like this???:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdietz View Post
Nvidia GeForce9800GT


You system is great, unfortunately your GPU can not perform adequately for the high needs of CoD.

You need to minimize the size of the CoD window to something like 1280x, remove Grass, Shadow, Roads, lower Textures to low, buildings low, building details low, forrest very little

and then test and see how your system behaves.

And your next acquisition should be a GPU with 1,5Gb VRAM (minimum 1,3Gb, better 2Gb VRAM).

~S~
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-23-2011, 06:15 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

DX11 cards with their ability to do tessellation shaders and whatnot are going to significantly outperform their dx9 and dx10 brethren.

That 9800 just wasn't going to cut it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-23-2011, 06:43 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles View Post
DX11 cards with their ability to do tessellation shaders and whatnot are going to significantly outperform their dx9 and dx10 brethren.

That 9800 just wasn't going to cut it.
Very true in fact the last generation dx9/10 cards outperformed 1st generation dx11 cards on some titles...
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.