![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I happened to lean out of the side of an open canopied Spitfire today, looking forward and there was my propeller, clearly visible as a spinning disc with yellow tips. Leaning back in it became barely visible. I think this looks accurate and it most definitely IS there.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it's always been there to me. Sometimes when you have the sun at your 6 you'll see the disc brighten up since it's reflecting the light. Propeller looks like it should, nearly invisible. In real life, you can't make it out as a moving item unless it's at low RPM and you're shifting view in the direction of the top blade. (Ever noticed that when staring at a helicopter looking dead center you can't really see the blades too defined, but if you start following the blade tip in it's rotation you can briefly make out the blade as your eyeball moves)..
Anyways, I think they look PERFECT ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree also.... looks good to me. I hope they don't go changing them just because people who have only seen spinning props on tv/film thinks that's how they're supposed to look.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
yesterday one of my mates was complaining because "the view was not shakeing when firing, like the gun cams" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fun fact for the day: the closer you are to a spinning propeller, the more difficult it is to see. When you look at a distant airplane, its prop will be more easily visible than the prop spinning just five feet in front of your face.
And concerning the yellow tips... I don't know so much about how various forces of WWII may have painted their props, but nowadays the common practice is to paint the side facing the pilot a uniform flat black, precisely to make it less visible, less chance of distraction. Only the side facing away from the pilot is painted with stripes at the tips to make the prop more visible to ground crew. The only time I ever saw the propeller while piloting small aircraft was when I forgot to turn off the wingtip strobe lights before entering a cloud. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't like this prop rendering because it is "flat", just better when you see it in the profile view, but in the 3/4 view it is poor rendered. Also when the prob is at lower rpm, the rendering is poor and flat, just like the old versions of CFS.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have fly in prop planes for years (not like pilot) and never saw the propeller disapear completely at any speed.You cant notice the blades of course, but ,iirc,there are a slight darken disc that i dont see in clod.i think it depends on the number of blades, if you have 4 blades, they will cover more surface, so less luminosity when they fade out by movement.You do not need a real plane, did a RC plane get the propeller totally invisible?
I like a lot the props in clod , but i think they could be much better.I think they tweaked the prop inside the cockpit due the antielipsis limitis. If not, why can you see your propeler outside the cokpit glass, but it disaper from inside? So they reduced the number of effect at medium RPM where the effect are more noticeables, and tranlated at the first stages of the engine running with very low RPM, and then , fade out completely.I hope im wrong and the propeller are has they should and we dont have a manipulated work. Actually,the effect i would like to have more, is the reflection of the sun over the propeller that i have seen in the airshow. There are here a real pilot that can give us his experience wiht a nose propeller?It could be very helpfull if he compare Clod's propellers, with reallity . |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A screenshot made from a movie shot during taxiing of a Vintage Tigermoth. Recordings made from front pit after flight. Low rpm, sun from six position.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
|
|