Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik
Reload this Page NASA X-43 mach7
Register FAQ Calendar

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2011, 09:03 PM
mavrickandgoose mavrickandgoose is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: olympia washington
Posts: 364
Default NASA X-43 mach7
just saw on history that the x-43 went mach 7 thats over 5000 mph and it uses a scram jet engine with no moving parts NASA says it can go at least mach 10 WOW
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-20-2011, 09:51 PM
Xilon_x's Avatar
Xilon_x Xilon_x is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 715
Default
yes fantastic mak 7 but this type of NASA experimental airplane are not agile in evasive maneuvers and attack is good only for sign a new speed record.
THE future of modern airplane is very special is a mix for a simulation and real fly.
Yes the AIRPLANE of future not have a human pilots but have remote control wirles and have
extreme performance is not tolerable by a human being.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-21-2011, 12:27 AM
brando's Avatar
brando brando is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 451
Default
evasive manoeuvres at Mach 7? LOL!
__________________
Another home-built rig:
AMD FX 8350, liquid-cooled. Asus Sabretooth 990FX Rev 2.0 , 16 GB Mushkin Redline (DDR3-PC12800), Enermax 1000W PSU, MSI R9-280X 3GB GDDR5
2 X 128GB OCZ Vertex SSD, 1 x64GB Corsair SSD, 1x 500GB WD HDD.
CH Franken-Tripehound stick and throttle merged, CH Pro pedals. TrackIR 5 and Pro-clip. Windows 7 64bit Home Premium.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-21-2011, 01:16 AM
JG27CaptStubing JG27CaptStubing is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 330
Default
The point of the Scramjet is to develop new engines for future travel... Mach 7 in a passenger capable plane would be pretty revolutionary. You could be somewhere in minutes as opposed to hours.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-21-2011, 01:27 AM
brando's Avatar
brando brando is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 451
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by JG27CaptStubing View Post
The point of the Scramjet is to develop new engines for future travel... Mach 7 in a passenger capable plane would be pretty revolutionary. You could be somewhere in minutes as opposed to hours.
Just so long as it doesn't involve too many Immelmanns or split-esses. LOL.
__________________
Another home-built rig:
AMD FX 8350, liquid-cooled. Asus Sabretooth 990FX Rev 2.0 , 16 GB Mushkin Redline (DDR3-PC12800), Enermax 1000W PSU, MSI R9-280X 3GB GDDR5
2 X 128GB OCZ Vertex SSD, 1 x64GB Corsair SSD, 1x 500GB WD HDD.
CH Franken-Tripehound stick and throttle merged, CH Pro pedals. TrackIR 5 and Pro-clip. Windows 7 64bit Home Premium.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-21-2011, 01:33 AM
WTE_Galway WTE_Galway is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default
Developed from secret Nazi UFO technology of course
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-21-2011, 03:47 AM
Avimimus Avimimus is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 803
Default
Guys, they couldn't make the Mach 2 Concord commercially viable.

As for evasive maneuvers - yes they may be somewhat relevant considering that what is trying to shoot you down will either be going at similar speed or be trying to fly in front of you (think of Mach 1, guided barrage balloons).

The future is subsonic.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-21-2011, 04:20 AM
Robotic Pope's Avatar
Robotic Pope Robotic Pope is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hertfordshire,England,UK
Posts: 1,520
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by JG27CaptStubing View Post
The point of the Scramjet is to develop new engines for future travel... Mach 7 in a passenger capable plane would be pretty revolutionary. You could be somewhere in minutes as opposed to hours.
Passenger travel would be a very, very long way down the road. Primarily this technology is being developed for getting payloads into space in a far cheaper way than today with huge rockets.
__________________


XBL GT: - Robotic Pope
HyperLobby CS: - Robot_Pope
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-21-2011, 04:43 AM
WTE_Galway WTE_Galway is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default
There is of course the "HSRFRV" .


http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01...amjet_revived/
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Contact Us - Fulqrum Publishing s.r.o. - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.