|
Pilot's Lounge Members meetup |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
i dont believe in chem trails but why so many planes fly over the cities
common sense would forbid planes flying over the cities but they do in consistent basis
so is it somehow enforced for the planes to fly over the cities? for the record i dont believe at all the chem trail nonsense but this kinds of back it up imho if they wanted to spread population control poisons they would do it with car fuel as they did with lead but this got me curious, any reason for planes flying over cities?
__________________
2.4ghz dual core cpu 3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Because cities have airports?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Sheesh. And people wonder why I've never had much faith in the human race at all, and why I quite honestly think that humans are an evolutionary dead end. One would think that after 4 million years of evolution, we'd be further along. But no, we're not. Hell, I'd say that the chemtrail-idiots, and many of the other conspiracytheorists out there, are deadset proof that we're descendants of primates, and that some humans are closer to our ancestors than others. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Eh our species hasnt been around too long, a few million years is still new kid on the block in geologic time.
AS to the OP, well, I mean that's where people go, to cities. Very few flights going to the middle of nowhere. And why would common sense dictate that they avoid overflying cities? What am I missing?
__________________
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
planes shouldnt fly over cities for the risk of them falling
is not this the reason for airports to be far from cities, maybe 30 km? they want us to think of cheim trials so we dont think of lead in gasoline or fluoride in water
__________________
2.4ghz dual core cpu 3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
they dont put lead in gas anymore...
It was used as a lubricant. If you buy an old car you have to add lead substitute... Anyway lead is not that bad and it tastes nice |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Lead is an abrasive. New car engines wear less than old "leaded" ones.
Proof? Conventional aircraft engines burn 100 octane leaded gas. Their TBO after, 60 years is the same. Why? They burn the same leaded abrasive fuel. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
- they require a huge amount of land, hard to find in cities(and expensive) - pollution and noise Now, several decades later the airports are im the middle because the cities grew towards and around them. The same is true for train stations btw. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
So you are telling me Lead is abrasive to Steel? What? Please explain. |
|
|