King's Bounty MMO

gunnyhighway · #1 11-12-2012, 06:09 AM

Now I put a lot of thought into this and I know the history of what happens when you take a good single player game and make it into an MMO but I think if they didn't do anything super huge it would be epic.

Focus on your core players forget the carebears. Keep it turn based with exploration across a larger play field. Lots of character customization.

So much potential without having to spend a lot of money for them.

And for the love of god don't make it free to play make it a sub. based game. I along with many of players would dish out hard earned cash for a game that we love to play. I would gladly give my money away to keep funding a small tight knit community of gamers.

Lets start posting what we would like to see from this type of game so if they ever do its on the right path

1. Large world to explore that could take forever to explore. This is a lot easier with this type of game because we require a lot less graphics wise.
2. Lots of customization between class's, no class able to dip into other classes type of play. Keep it unique
3. Vast choices of armies to choose from.
4. More variations on spells
5. Change for warrior type class so that rage can be used on bosses.
6. Co-op fights verus other players and bosses. Could you imagine teaming up as a warrior with a mage friend to buff the crap out of you large army while u focus on demolishing.
7. Players input on expanding story line
8. No quests just xp from exploring and bosses.
9. Story line ever changing based on your decisions.

Just some ideas too busy playing to wanna type em all out will finish up later.

Totoro · #2 11-12-2012, 07:52 AM

When any game is transformed into a MMO, it rarely can be called anything else than an attempt to cash in.

I think King's Bounty should always be a single player game.

Maybe you should suggest your idea in HoMM forums since that series has already been ruined so it can't get much worse.

gunnyhighway · #3 11-12-2012, 07:56 AM

As long as they don't make it a true mmo just give it some mmo features. Keeping up replayablity so we are not waiting for the next single player kings bounty every 6 years.

Nevar · #4 11-12-2012, 08:30 AM

I hope I'm not sounding stupid here, but KB does have an MMO. It's called KB Legions. It's not very good, though.

gunnyhighway · #5 11-12-2012, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevar

I hope I'm not sounding stupid here, but KB does have an MMO. It's called KB Legions. It's not very good, though.

Not stupid at all but its pretty crap. Cash shop web browser junk game. Same crap they did with settlers games.

blacklegionary · #6 11-12-2012, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevar

I hope I'm not sounding stupid here, but KB does have an MMO. It's called KB Legions. It's not very good, though.

When I know about that game, I was really afraid that they would ditch WOTN because of it.

fastjaw24 · #7 11-12-2012, 03:57 PM

If they released a King's Bounty MMO in the condition this game got released they be lucky anyone played it longer than a week tops. Hell you have to be able to make a single player game before you can make a MMO. Plus this company doesn't have the money to make a real MMO nor do I think they want to invest in one. MMOs are kinda fading now those are so 5 years ago now a days people are actually going back and demanding fun multiplayer and coop game now again which I am sure glad.

Its been proven though you can still make money off single player games without a tact on crappy coop or multiplayer hence Skyrim is probably going to be the biggest selling single player game of all time and will probably make the top 10 list of best selling video games by the time it runs its course Im sure. I mean hell Bethesda all they do is make single player games and they are one of the biggest game companies too(and yes I do know they have published multiplayer games)

The point of this is King's Bounty could become a best selling single player game if they put a little better effort into it next time. If 1C Company does not want to spend the time or money to make the game better just sell it off to Ubisoft and with their experience with HOMM series I am sure they could throw some good money at it and make it pretty awesome with the current developer(of course it will get a crap DRM like they do with all their games).

Nevar · #8 11-12-2012, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fastjaw24

The point of this is King's Bounty could become a best selling single player game if they put a little better effort into it next time.

I don't believe this is true. As far as I'm aware, KB is considered a cult classic- it has a small, dedicated number of players. There aren't that many people who prefer turn-based strategy over an FPS, RPG or RTS. I just don't think there is enough demand for KB to ever be a best-selling series, and it's not just because of the problems with WotN.

For the same reason, though, I don't think the devs will ever invest a lot in a multiplayer version of KB. You can argue and tell me HoMM has multiplayer, but HoMM is a different series.

evguenil · #9 11-12-2012, 04:16 PM

There's a sort of King's Bounty MMO.
It is King's Bounty: The Legions.

You can find it on Facebook as application.

fastjaw24 · #10 11-12-2012, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevar

I don't believe this is true. As far as I'm aware, KB is considered a cult classic- it has a small, dedicated number of players. There aren't that many people who prefer turn-based strategy over an FPS, RPG or RTS. I just don't think there is enough demand for KB to ever be a best-selling series, and it's not just because of the problems with WotN.

For the same reason, though, I don't think the devs will ever invest a lot in a multiplayer version of KB. You can argue and tell me HoMM has multiplayer, but HoMM is a different series.

You don't have to prefer turn-based strategy over a certain genre in order to get a top selling game. You have to be able to make the game fun for people to play and put a lot better effort into your game then this game got. I play every type of genre game made as long as I find the game fun to play. Do I think that King's Bounty in its current condition is going to be a top seller....hell no. But you go on to say that turn based strategy can not be a top selling game and that is wrong. Civilization 5 is a turned based strategy game. Hell I mean its more turn based then King's Bounty is and people buy the crap out of it. Is it number 1 selling game of all time...no. Civilization is a good example of how if you make a turned based strategy game and you do a good job people will play it no matter what kinda game they like.

Why do people buy Civ 5? Well for one its a long running proven series that kinda started out like a cult classic but got pretty popular. They also buy it cause its a lot of fun to play and they do not care what category or genre it fits in. I mean hell over 2 years after release its still 1 of the top 10 played games on steam so I say turn based strategy can be a top seller if the effort is put into it. I have a lot of friends if I asked them if they liked turn based strategy games they would tell me..."no". But then I go on to say "but you play Civ 5 and its turn based strategy." And they say "Well that game is a lot of fun to play"

Even DragonAge on pc they thought people would not like the fact that you can pause the action. So basically DragonAge has turned into almost like a turn based strategy where you pause...issue orders...unpause and then repeat the process. But again where most people said it was a bad idea you have people that only want to play on PC cause of that feature alone that is not available on console.

I could argue from a single player point of a lot of people told Bethesda you going to have to make your game multiplayer or its just not going to sell. And they refused to make it multiplayer and after Morrowind,Oblivion,Fallout 3,New Vegas(they only partially developed this), and then Skyrim they basically continued to improve their game as time went and now not only have a best selling series they literally have thee best selling single player game of all time. Take a look at Arena(Elder Scrolls 1) would you have said that series would become the number 1 selling single player game of all time? Arena was crap it was pretty bad but a few people liked it. How about Daggerfalls(Elder Scrolls 2) would you have said it then? Probably not, so to say that King's Bounty is not capable of becoming a best seller I think is very wrong.

I know you going to say well civ 5 has multiplayer and you are right it does. Then you will go on to say that a single player turned based strategy game will never make it as a best seller. And well you could be right there,but you never know with their current effort especially with wotn. I see this game getting maybe one more installment if they do another halfazz job like that again.

At this point I think King's Bounty has a very good foundation to become a lot better selling of a game(not like we trying to make a best seller out of E.T. from Atari) it just depends on how much time and money 1C Company is willing to give it. And by my guess is not much.