![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone who can tell how good it is modeled?
This would be interesting to know... ![]()
__________________
AMD Penom ll 6x 1055T Processor 2.8 GHz // 8GB Ram // XFX Radeon HD 7870 Black Edition DD (2048 MB Memory DDR5, GPU 1055MHz) // Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit Version Saitek x52 // Saitek Throttle Quadrant // Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedals // Track IR 5 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
yeah im sure with internets anonimity some will appear
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I havent flown real Su26 but other aerobatic plane and i could say that Su 26 FM in Clod is much better modeled then other CLOD planes ( 109 or british fighters).
It is possible to make quite good hamerhead (stall turns), snap rolls - even half snap roll, inverted spins which most of these manouvers are not possible to do in CLOD fighter planes ( but should be possible). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S!
I managed to get the Bf109 in a strange floaty state in a hammerheadish move. And you will flip flop the Bf109 EXACTLY the same way as in original IL-2 when you apply rudder while banking the plane and have even slightest of pull. Overheat is not a problem though when you do not fly 100% all the time but maximum 1.21ata ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Aerobatic planes normally have a symmetrical wing profile, unlike WW2 aircraft, to make aerobatics easier, so it surely is easier to do aerobatic (and come out of certain manoeuvres) with an aerobatic plane as opposed to a WW2 fighter. I have flown with a Yak 52 in a couple of occasions and they're quite well balanced machines, a Yak 50 would probably be closer to the Su 26, but I can ask a couple of folks, although they'd have to try the sim as well.. oh well, I'll try.. |
![]() |
|
|