![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Suppose the glass is 1/3 full.
You can legitimately call that half empty, because over half of it is empty, but if you called it half full, you'd be exaggerating. Equally, what if the glass is 2/3 full? Then, if you called it half empty, you'd be telling porkies, but if you said it was half full you'd be telling a half truth at worst. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“Violent, irrational, intolerant, allied to racism and tribalism and bigotry, invested in ignorance and hostile to free inquiry, contemptuous of women and coercive toward children: organized religion ought to have a great deal on its conscience.” ― Christopher Hitchens |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
One solution is to say that you just need to bring in comparison operators. Saying that its "at least half empty" then encompasses the instance of being "1/3 full". Another way of looking at is the glass is always completely full, half with water and half with air. (Half full to the human eye, half empty from the perspective of air content.) According to a linguist, the glass is half full, because the word 'full' and the word 'glass' are related in the same contextual meaning. A glass is primarily filled and not emptied, so if it contains water, we should be considering how filled with something and not emptied of something the glass is. In other words, the glass is a container and not a "emptier". Finally you may wish to decide on full versus empty on the basis of its previous state. Hence if you are pouring a drink it is converging on the half fulls state from a previously empty state. if you are drinking the drink its converging on a half empty state from a previously full state. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are, it has been said, two types of people in the world. There are those who, when presented with a glass that is exactly half full, say: this glass is half full. And then there are those who say: this glass is half empty. The world belongs, however, to those who can look at the glass and say: What's up with this glass? Excuse me? Excuse me? This is my glass? I don't think so. My glass was full! And it was a bigger glass!
Terry Pratchett, The Truth |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Terry Pratchett
![]() The Archbishop of Canterbury ![]() Ironic innit. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My glass was half full, but some of the contents were incompatible with my glass, so they were taken away. Much of what I put into the glass dried up in the meantime. Later I was promised a tankard. However it's contents remain unknown and indeed can not be guaranteed until my present glass can function as well as other glasses.
The suppliers of the glass hope to turn it into a tankard for me, but as yet can not seem to get a handle on it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I applause the spirit, Gents. Plenty of logic coupled with a touch of humor and some deep thoughts that make you go, hmm!
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The glass needs a patch.
That actually works.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just see water in a glass... if I'm thirsty, I'll drink it
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4 Stand alone Collector's Edition DCS Series Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound. |
![]() |
|
|