![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is not a rant in any way, as we are most certainly divided. I was just thinking about this the other day...on how certain releases have torn apart folks that have a common interest.
One of the bigger ones I can remember was the release of Flanker 2.0. I was at Combatsim at the time and there were battles going on that were mostly Flanker vs. Falcon arguments. Whats my point? Not sure I have one really...just seems different here and the battle has been going on longer than some real wars. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Look at the the stats here (only 20 guys actually answered to the questions, thanks guys!) http://www.diavolirossi.net/manu/cfs/main.php "Us" who?
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-20-2012 at 02:55 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok...your going to have to explain this. What did I do to harm a survey I've never heard of?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Typo issue!! Edited.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-20-2012 at 02:54 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So your saying there is no such thing as a flight sim community based on some obscure survey (that you created?) that 99.99% of flight simmers have never heard of? Sounds like a case of hurt feelings more than anything else.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You should have been here ( maby you where and just chose to forget the mess
![]() That was........well, i think you get the picture. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Answer to original question = Yes
Title of Game = il2 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I've never flown in an arcade server, that's 2/3 HL was made of at the time. And the "full difficulty" servers I flew in were the ones without external views. So I'm part of a little IL2 community, a single rib of the global IL2 community. So IMO the CloD is not dividing those communities.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CloD don't have a "community" flying MP as IL-2 146 have.
Too much issues to be solved in software first. After this, we'll see the IL-2 1946 MP folks going to CloD/IL-2 new titles ASAP. Simple and crystal clear. |
![]() |
|
|