Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-20-2012, 02:22 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default Anyone remember a sim that divided us as much as COD?

This is not a rant in any way, as we are most certainly divided. I was just thinking about this the other day...on how certain releases have torn apart folks that have a common interest.

One of the bigger ones I can remember was the release of Flanker 2.0. I was at Combatsim at the time and there were battles going on that were mostly Flanker vs. Falcon arguments. Whats my point? Not sure I have one really...just seems different here and the battle has been going on longer than some real wars.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-20-2012, 02:33 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
This is not a rant in any way, as we are most certainly divided. I was just thinking about this the other day...on how certain releases have torn apart folks that have a common interest.

One of the bigger ones I can remember was the release of Flanker 2.0. I was at Combatsim at the time and there were battles going on that were mostly Flanker vs. Falcon arguments. Whats my point? Not sure I have one really...just seems different here and the battle has been going on longer than some real wars.
"Us"... define it please. I'm against the concept of "flight simmers community".

Look at the the stats here (only 20 guys actually answered to the questions, thanks guys!)
http://www.diavolirossi.net/manu/cfs/main.php

"Us" who?
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.

Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-20-2012 at 02:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-20-2012, 02:44 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6S.Manu View Post
(only 20 guys actually answered to the questions, thanks to you!)
Ok...your going to have to explain this. What did I do to harm a survey I've never heard of?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-20-2012, 02:50 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
Ok...your going to have to explain this. What did I do to harm a survey I've never heard of?


Typo issue!! Edited.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.

Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-20-2012 at 02:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-20-2012, 03:20 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

So your saying there is no such thing as a flight sim community based on some obscure survey (that you created?) that 99.99% of flight simmers have never heard of? Sounds like a case of hurt feelings more than anything else.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-20-2012, 03:23 PM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

You should have been here ( maby you where and just chose to forget the mess) when IL2`s code was cracked and the net was flooded with unauthorized mods, omg.

That was........well, i think you get the picture.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-20-2012, 03:27 PM
tintifaxl tintifaxl is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6S.Manu View Post
"Us"... define it please. I'm against the concept of "flight simmers community".

Look at the the stats here (only 20 guys actually answered to the questions, thanks guys!)
http://www.diavolirossi.net/manu/cfs/main.php

"Us" who?
21 guys now.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-20-2012, 03:38 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Answer to original question = Yes
Title of Game = il2
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-20-2012, 03:38 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
So your saying there is no such thing as a flight sim community based on some obscure survey (that you created?) that 99.99% of flight simmers have never heard of? Sounds like a case of hurt feelings more than anything else.
Look... I'm here since the first IL2.

I've never flown in an arcade server, that's 2/3 HL was made of at the time.

And the "full difficulty" servers I flew in were the ones without external views.

So I'm part of a little IL2 community, a single rib of the global IL2 community.

So IMO the CloD is not dividing those communities.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-20-2012, 03:43 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

CloD don't have a "community" flying MP as IL-2 146 have.

Too much issues to be solved in software first.

After this, we'll see the IL-2 1946 MP folks going to CloD/IL-2 new titles ASAP.

Simple and crystal clear.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.