Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > CoD Multiplayer

CoD Multiplayer Everything about multiplayer in IL-2 CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2012, 09:46 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Question Team Balancing Discussion

One multiplayer problem that has not really being discussed at any great length is the balance of teams... Take last night for example I joined the ATAG server and found that there were 24 Blues Vs 10 Red, now as you can guess I am a Blue pilot but when I see a unbalanced game I join the team that has the least players (unless they are quite balanced already). I jumped in a spit at hawkinge and predictable within 5 seconds a 110 had shot me before I could even start my engine I jumped in another and the same 110 strafed me again... Yes it was predictable so I jumped to Ramsgate only to find a few 109 are already trying to dominate the skies.

Now this is not a uncommon occurance and I have occasionally being know to strafe but as I fly red now and again I know how annoying it can be so I now only use bombs.

Anyway my point is that there is a real problem online on that when you have a server that has no team balancing and pilots not willing to jump in an a aircraft they are not accustomed to for obvious reason and the server allows strafing the team that is down on players has a big problem.

Now other games have a team balance ability but I do not believe this is a workable solution to CoDs problems as a player that is forced onto a team they are not used to flying will probably just quit and look for another server... So what's the solution lets discuss!
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:10 AM
SNAFU SNAFU is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 324
Default

Without forced team-balance you have no chance to balance the numbers on public servers, visited by more than 20 players randomly.

I don´t mind unbalanced teams generally if the missions are designed well.

Strafing as result of unbalanced teams is a typical syndrom of bored players. If you do not have any objective but to shoot at other other planes wich appear randomly and you do not find any plane to shoot at, you go for the place where you can be sure you find what you are looking for - the oppfor airfields.

So, give the players an objective, a feeling for the objective and an award for achieving this objective. At the same time penalize them for not achieving their objective and doing something stupid, like strafing enemy airfields with guns. This usually works to a certain degree. But so far on the DF servers you can simply leave your plane if it has a scratch on the canopy or you just put your plane and your v-life into the next hill, without any consequenzes - it too easy to follow the temptation of the quicky-airquake and besides you mostly have nothing else to do anyway. If you stop the AI Bombers or not, if bomb the train/ship/tank or not, so what? Teamplay? What for? Any formations you meet are usually AI bombers, no fighters, so...

Therefore you simply end up with the situation of take-off, head to the next enemy airfield, if you do not find anything flying to shoot at, look on the ground, strafe a little, get shot down by the one above the airfield you didn´t see and repeat... So far I have seen, we only have this kind of dogfight servers, for CloD, maybe that will change someday...

sorry not time for a spell-check...

Last edited by SNAFU; 01-04-2012 at 10:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:10 AM
MoGas MoGas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Austria
Posts: 112
Default

Thats why I fly RED too now. Lot of people seems do dislike RED planes, like SpitI-Ia etc....Or the 109 lobby is just bigger I dont know. It got not interresting for me to fly with 3x109`s against a single Spitfire, now since I am RED I have the issue on my side, that you get jumbed by 3-5 109`s at the same time at 15.000ft.

And even with 4-5 109 turning around you, and you see, now its time to go, for a tactical "extend", the call you runner lol...anyway...

Thx to ATAG lol, for atleast 5x SpitII`s otherwise this heavy outnumbering of one side is getting boring. With the SpitII you can get out of it if you keep the eyes up, and not getting target fixed.

Had good fights against ALOT of enemys in the last days on the ATAG server against good (russian ) players, without a SpitII you just dont need to take off, with this poor Spitys.

Soo in this case, I try to keep the RED numbers up....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:18 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Agreed I now think the spit 2 is okay in small numbers and helps alleviate the problem, but now we have the problem of the Manston airfield been targeted due to the spit 2s I have done this myself got 4 sc 50 and attempted to get them but just got jumped by three spits XD, but this is why Ramsgate is no longer safe as ppl come to Manston so now all red airfields are targeted lol. Luckily the spit 2 is so good it can deal with 109s even shortly after take off.

The problem is not entirely the blues fault, reds should head out to the channel a bit more.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:19 AM
335th_GRAthos 335th_GRAthos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,240
Default

If the team is very imbalanced, I will just take a bomber or a "heavy fighter" (ME110) and go for ground targets practice (this does not mean ground Huris/Spits, lol).

~S~
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:30 AM
FG28_Kodiak FG28_Kodiak is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Swabia->Bavaria->Germany
Posts: 884
Default

Hm strafing could be prevent via script, make a area around an airfield if a enemy plane enter it, you can destroy him or disable his weapons. You can also only enable this "shield" if the balancing is to bad. But it's not historical
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:44 AM
MoGas MoGas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Austria
Posts: 112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
The problem is not entirely the blues fault, reds should head out to the channel a bit more.
Thats what you want if RED, but in most cases, you get hard pushed, by BLUE numbers at RED fields already like H14. I take Ramsgate or Manston, I am not even thinking about Hawking, and after airborn, I try to climb away north or to the west and get ALT before I start to search high 109`s above H14.

Ofcourse it is not always the case, that ALL RED fields are been under fire by BLUE at the same time, but if you would get strafed ones on one field, you need to take a other one right away.

I see players getting vulched by the enemy two times in a row, and he starts to pitch via chat, sorry, this is youre own fault, I mean a good indicator that you are in danger is the mass of AAA around the base lol!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:46 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Yes but all airfield can be dominated if the teams are not balanced that's the problem I raised.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:48 AM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

if there is only one base available to fly 'the' red bomber, if it takes some minutes till you can move it because you need time to warm up.......

time will tell.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:52 AM
MoGas MoGas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Austria
Posts: 112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
Yes but all airfield can be dominated if the teams are not balanced that's the problem I raised.

yes sure...

I see the trend too, that BLUE covers Manston (SpitII base) more, besides the H14 zone, what means Ramsgate too...

Last edited by MoGas; 01-04-2012 at 10:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.