Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2011, 10:48 PM
Madfish Madfish is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 423
Question Where is the Su-26?

Actually, the first thing that went through my head when I saw the "development update" was: where is the Su-26?

Could it be that we finally see it in the next patch or is there no need to show the refined flight model anymore or listen to those who would love an aerobatics plane for the sim?

Quote:
Originally Posted by luthier View Post
Hi everyone.

Here’s what we’ve been doing, and what we’re planning for the nearest future.
[...]
4. Models. We have quite a few new aircraft variants in the oven, and "our" [...]
Quote:
PCG: There’s a Su-26 amongst the flyables. How did this modern aerobatics plane end-up in the sim?

ILYA: We thought it would be a great way to prove the fidelity of our flight model. Not too many people can get behind the controls of a Heinkel and say “Yes, this handles just like the real thing.”. There are a lot of people who fly the Su-26 or similar aerobatics planes. Besides, a few of our modellers actually worked for Sukhoi back in the day, and one of them was even a member of the Su-26 design team. He designed the landing gear for the real thing, and then recreated it for us!

OLEG: Another reason we included the Su-26 is pilots from real aerobatic teams requested it. They used Il-2 for the training in the past. In Cliffs of Dover they can fly a real sport plane.
from: http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/02/08/il...ya-shevchenko/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-13-2011, 11:03 PM
skouras skouras is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Greece-Athens
Posts: 1,171
Default

i think they going to implemented in the future as the top priority for the dev's is the new sounds and the grapfic engine
also Luthier states that in the upcoming patch there will be some new variants of aircraft
so it is ok from me i supposed...
-s-
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-14-2011, 10:24 AM
kedrednael kedrednael is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 88
Default

It was a descision by ubisoft to let the su-26 out of the final game. The su-26 was already finished.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-14-2011, 11:55 AM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

quite a bit of lies in that article for sure. published on the 8th feb, about 6/7 weeks before release, why did it all fall apart ?

Last edited by Ali Fish; 08-14-2011 at 12:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-14-2011, 11:58 AM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

i personaly dont miss it !
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2011, 02:57 PM
jayrc's Avatar
jayrc jayrc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 339
Default

Can't forget the He-59, those were some brave men, ~S~
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2011, 03:38 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehawk View Post
Give us the German trainers instead, maybe a glider first (how unique would that be?), then a Bu 181, or possibly the He-72.
how often did you flew the Tiger Moth ?
I did it once, maximum 5 minutes.........................

They should put their precious time in the development of combat aircraft. Trainer aircraft in a game........ you hit refly and one is not dying in front of a PC screen 'cockpit'
A trainer does teach you nothing in game - the most complex stuff in CoD is its CEM not the flying itself.

The Spit'Lady' and the italian planes (because they came soooo late in action in 1940 !) were already questionable decisions in the CoD planeset.
All the work in a flyable Wellington instead would have been much better IMHO - but thats past....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2011, 03:44 PM
skouras skouras is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Greece-Athens
Posts: 1,171
Default

totally agree
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2011, 04:01 PM
Jaws2002 Jaws2002 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 851
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kedrednael View Post
It was a descision by ubisoft to let the su-26 out of the final game. The su-26 was already finished.


Bull.

It was 1c, the Russian publisher, that pulled it out of the game, so they can milk us later for it, as a Paid Addon.

There was even a comment by Oleg somwhere about it.

1C pushed the game before it was ready, they also took the SU-26 out to sell it later.

Don't blame UBI for it. This whole mess is 1c's doinng.
__________________
----------------------------------------
Asus Sabertooth Z77
i7 3770k@4.3GHz+ Noctua NH D14 cooler
EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked+ACX cooler.
8GB G.Skill ripjaws DDR3-1600
Crucial M4 128GB SSD+Crucial M4 256GB SSD
Seagate 750GB HDD
CH Fighterstick+CH Pro pedals+Saitek X45
Win7 64bit
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-14-2011, 04:02 PM
Plt Off JRB Meaker's Avatar
Plt Off JRB Meaker Plt Off JRB Meaker is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Windsor,UK
Posts: 864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
how often did you flew the Tiger Moth ?
I did it once, maximum 5 minutes.........................

They should put their precious time in the development of combat aircraft. Trainer aircraft in a game........ you hit refly and one is not dying in front of a PC screen 'cockpit'
A trainer does teach you nothing in game - the most complex stuff in CoD is its CEM not the flying itself.

The Spit'Lady' and the italian planes (because they came soooo late in action in 1940 !) were already questionable decisions in the CoD planeset.
All the work in a flyable Wellington instead would have been much better IMHO - but thats past....
A flyable Wellington,yup,would've loved that,have'nt flown the Italian planes,don't think I ever will,what a waste of time and ebergy.

The history of the Italian air force during the BOB was laughable,they flew two very unsuccessful missions,and on both occasions got slaughtered by the RAF Hurricanes.

I have to agree,the devs would have won over more friends by spending their time creating a flyable Wellington,what a pity.

As regards the Spit lady,don't even go there,they did'nt include the animated bail out,that was left out,but we got the Spit lady.......,Jeez!!
__________________
http://i1098.photobucket.com/albums/g374/fastted/82%20Squadron%20Banner.jpg

Alienware Aurora|Win 7 64-bit Home Premium|IC i7-920 Processor (Quad-Core)|14GB DDR3 RAM|1 TB SATA 7200rpm Hard Drive|GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 770 2GB WINDFORCE 3 X fan|Thrustmaster Warthog|Saitek Pro Combat rudder pedals,throttle quadrant and Cessna trim wheel|TrackIR4|Sense of humour,I find it comes in handy!

Last edited by Plt Off JRB Meaker; 08-14-2011 at 04:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.