|
|
#1
02-23-2009, 03:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Development time SoW
Hi all,
When i look at the posts, here at 1C, i see a lot of people yada, yada about the development time of SoW. I know it's hard to wait for the final release but please take a look at fighterops.com for instance and you will find out that also this sim takes a (very ) long time to develop. So stop your worries about SoW! Every (good ) sim will take a very long time to develop. This is how it is and always will be... 
|
|
#2
02-23-2009, 04:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just blame the success of the IL2 series... Oleg has said that the only reason he has had the time=$ to "develop" a good & detailed flight combat sim is because of the popularity of "IL2". Otherwise he would have slap-dashed a "half finished" product on the public...
|
|
#3
02-24-2009, 08:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I saw that statement by Oleg. He didn't say Il-2 gave him $$$. Creative freedom, perhaps. But dollars - certainly not!
|
|
#4
02-24-2009, 10:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Money is freedom _lol, it must have something to do with money...otherwise he would have been under financial pressure to release "something"...
|
|
#5
02-26-2009, 03:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
When I'm losing my faith I go watching this:
__________________
 A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
|
|
#6
02-26-2009, 04:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very nice Manu, but will it fly this year?
|
|
#7
02-26-2009, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I really don't know... Damn you.. now I need to find another picture to feel nice when I'm losing my faith about Oleg... 
__________________
A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
|
|
#10
02-26-2009, 05:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
