Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-24-2011, 07:23 AM
PeterPanPan PeterPanPan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 559
Default PC Pilot Review

There's very nice coverage of CoD in the current issue of PC Pilot. Thankfully, due to editorial deadlines, they didn't have time to do a proper review but promise to do so in the next issue. So, a positive reviewette for now and hopefully a glowing one in the next issue.


PPP
__________________
Intel Core i7 2600 3.4 GHz | 1GB Gainward GTX 460 GS | Corsair 4GB XMS3 PC3-12800 1600MHz (1x4GB) | Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3P B3 (Intel P67) | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 BIT | 600W PSU | 1 TB SATA-II HDD 7200 32MB | 22" Samsung T220 screen.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-24-2011, 07:59 AM
baronWastelan baronWastelan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: the future home of Starfleet Academy
Posts: 628
Default

I prefer all my outdated info printed on dead trees!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2011, 08:16 AM
Immermann Immermann is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baronWastelan View Post
I prefer all my outdated info printed on dead trees!
Hey! Don't be mean to Tree!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2011, 05:31 PM
2033cyborg 2033cyborg is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by col123 View Post
LMAO at the excuse they gave....due to editorial deadlines, they didn't have time to do a proper review....yeh right!...only the biggest wait in 6 years is over and the top pc flightsim mag on the planet cant even manage an honest retail review due to their BS excuses! The game has been out ages and they still havnt done a review yet how pathetic!....Another sit on the fence reviewer who prefers to wait to see if any further patches save this broken mess..
+1
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2011, 05:42 PM
Davy TASB Davy TASB is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 46
Default

I'm gonna stick up for PC Pilot here.
The last issue of the mag was released at about the same time as the game was released in the UK and the mag is only published every 2 months.

Have to admit though, that I cant see PC Pilot slating the sim even if they want to seeing as they would be sort of cutting their own nose off to spite their face (or summat like that! )
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-24-2011, 05:49 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Good. Because in Custom PC magazine they reviewed it and gave it 35%. That means everyone thinks it's XXXXX and won't buy it or try it. I would have preferred that they didn't review it at all and did so later - that way we may have more people trying CFS genre. Still, if you prefer to have a nice rant to somehow proove a point that everyone else already knows then go ahead.

Regarding the article, I was rather hoping that it was scanned or copied out here so we could read it, not a pointless photo to show that it exists.

Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 06-28-2011 at 01:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-24-2011, 05:59 PM
Greiss Greiss is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 8
Default

I'll take anything that PC Pilot Magazine says with a grain of salt and I've purchased the magazine for many years from Barnes & Noble.

This is also the same magazine that gave FSX a glowing 95% review upon its release. Anybody who's been around the MS FS block knows that FSX was a performance mess upon release, plagued with coding problems, landclass issues, etc. It took two major patches to get the darned thing playable.

PC Pilot is in it to make money, nothing more, nothing less.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-24-2011, 06:28 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by col123 View Post
.............................only the biggest wait in 6 years is over...........................................The game has been out ages

So, did the game get released early or late? Sorry for saying so, but you seem to be contradicting yourself a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-24-2011, 06:43 PM
Mysticpuma's Avatar
Mysticpuma Mysticpuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 1,059
Default

PC Gamer UK gave it 72%

Way too lenient!
__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2yjr679.png
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-24-2011, 10:41 PM
Positronic Positronic is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 37
Default

I have this issue, It says while they did get the game, they were not able to play it for long enough to give a fair appraisal.

Thats fine by me, If I want an early review from a general gaming site there are plenty out there already, gamespot, pcgamer etc

Pcpilot mentions the game has had performance issues since release and the devs are trying to resolve them.

This preview just gives an overview of the game modes.

If you need context of time they reviewed DCS A-10C warthog in this issue (and liked it)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.