![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am so very desperate to enjoy this sim in the rich way that I did with IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 but it is getting harder by the day.
I have thoroughly enjoyed moments since COD's release & this inspired me to make a vid & I see what this sim can truly offer but to experience it in it's truest form, you need to take away all training aids, & fly properly with full-on CEM, temp effects etc. Now here's my dilemma. Although the patches have always installed with success, my moderate quad core machine hasn't seen any of these improvements or "massive performance improvements" that so many lucky folk speak of. With days of tinkering & getting to grips with the great CEM system, I am suddenly (since the last beta & tonight's main patch), affected with severe fps drops when my Spit or Hurri climbs to an altitude of 1000 feet or more but only when facing to the front. Looking up, left or right or even behind or to the ground, I'm enjoying fps between 35-60 over land but facing forward; a sudden drop to 7-15 fps. This, I have deduced, is completely down to the exhaust effects. I turn off CEM but keep all graphics settings the same & looking to the front is the same healthy fps rate as when looking in other directions (because the effects are taken away with auto management). I turned the visual effects from my normal 'medium' to a 'low' setting & this took away the exhaust effect at the expense of explosions, fire, splashes & just about every other combat detail you come to expect in a WWII sim on a quad core machine, 4GB Ram & GTX 580 card. And so I'm stuck with using CEM & a featureless experience or have the explosions & everything we come to expect & dumb down to an automated pilot experience whereby the automation decides to chop your prop pitch just after take off with no say in the matter or indeed any over ride by the user. If anyone knows of a workaround that enables you to fly CEM with medium visual effect settings without such an alarming drop then I'd welcome the help. ![]() My system is: Intel Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8400 2.66GHz @ 2.67GHz, 4GB DDR3 RAM, ZOTAC GeForce GTX 580 amp! edition with latest drivers & Vista 64 with SP2 Last edited by Houndstone Hawk; 04-18-2011 at 07:58 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First thing u should do is OC your cpu. Gtx 580 in that rig is frankly, a complete waste, especially at stock cpu speeds.
No offence. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
without much else to go on, I'd say the weak point is the CPU/OS - depending on your motherboard/power supply the CPU is ripe for overclocking, which would undoubtedly help - 3-3.2GHz should be doable with stock cooling, 3.6 and up to possibly 4GHz with decent cooling. That might not be your thing though - but I'm surprised you're having problems with graphical effects, considering you're running a GTX 580; I'm deducing that the CPU must be chocking trying to feed the GPU with the information it needs.
Windows 7 would be a viable upgrade too - I'd advise anyone to do that upgrade if they have the cash to spare. e: hah, nanja'd |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My suggestion: try Land Detail on 'Medium', Forest on 'Low', Texture quality on 'High' or 'Medium' (this was one of the big killers - 'Original' is as it was before optimising), and Land Shading on 'Medium'.
I run the settings like this, and it runs well and looks good.
__________________
I'd rather be flying ... Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 | AMD FX-8350 | MSI HD7970 TFOC-BE | 8GB Corsair DDR-III 1866 | Win8.1 Pro 64-bit
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() *Edit* M/Board is a P5QC & P/Supply 850W if any help. Last edited by Houndstone Hawk; 04-18-2011 at 08:35 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That's a great place to start, imho. Clunk's is a nice noob friendly place with a hell of a lot of info. Give us the name of the mobo/psu if you can, or a link to where you got the PC/parts from - we can start there ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm simply amazed by how all over the place people's experiences are. You have the same motherboard as me (plus a few bells and whistles) a better proc. (except for mine is OC'd).and a WAY better vid card, yet your having a worse experience. It's really unbelievable, but I guess that's just how computers are.
Assuming that you have the same Bios as I have, your board, while not being an overclocker's dream isn't to difficult to OC. I'll make another post with some basic instructions for you as soon as I stick my head in the bios to make sure I remember everything right. I'm still confounded though, I can slide the canopy back and stick my head out in front of the exhaust and the frames don't waver with my GTX 470! Maybe it is the OC?
__________________
I'm pretty much just here for comic relief. Q6600@3.02 GHz, 4gig DDR2, GTX470, Win7 64bit |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it's graphic effects causing a slowdown, I doubt if it's anything to do with the CPU. I would also be very careful of trying to OC if you don't know what you are doing. That way lies smoking ruin for your PC.
Are you sure it's the exhaust and not the mirror? With your PC you should definitely get pretty reasonable performance. |
![]() |
|
|