Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2011, 07:35 PM
Pluto Pluto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 268
Default fix for instruments Hurricane

Maybe there is already something written about this issue but I didnt have time to look.
Anyway, I realized that the artificial horizon on the Hurricane does not work properly, that should be corrected, if possible in the next patch!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2011, 07:41 PM
Redroach's Avatar
Redroach Redroach is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 709
Default

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=21481
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2011, 07:49 PM
1.JaVA_Platypus's Avatar
1.JaVA_Platypus 1.JaVA_Platypus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: De Gooische matras!
Posts: 110
Default

It's not a bug, it's a feature.

I've said it countless times, back in the starting days of Il-2

The exact story behind it, I don't know. But british gyro instruments had a tendency to do that kind of thing. The instrument will slowly erect itself if you fly straight and level for a few minutes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2011, 08:10 PM
Extreme_One's Avatar
Extreme_One Extreme_One is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1.JaVA_Platypus View Post
...

I've said it countless times, back in the starting days of Il-2
...
I honestly never noticed it in IL2.

It's truly awesome that this is modelled.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-17-2011, 01:09 PM
Pluto Pluto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 268
Default

...aha... so this is normal on a Hurricane?

In a thick cloud where you cant see anything outside the cockpit its pure guessing then if you fly straight and level or anything else.
Didnt they have (clever) engineers at Hawker at the time to fix that?

They should at least have thought about the trouble that they will cause to people who will fly their plane in a virtual reality some 70 years later.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-17-2011, 03:26 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Pluto, in real life one wouldn't fly into a cloud without a very, very convincing reason!
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-17-2011, 03:40 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

It doesn't only happen on Hurricanes, it's the same in the Spitfire and the me-110 and i guess in most of the other aircraft that have an artificial horizon.

If you end up in a cloud with the AH messed up, you can fly with the other instruments. The 109E doesn't even have an AH and on top of that it doesn't have a climb rate indicator either, so you must cross-reference the turn and bank indicator with the altitude and airspeed dials to deduce what's going on. It's still doable to make such a recovery but it just takes longer. For example, if i'm in a cloud, altitude dropping, speed picking up and i see the turn and bank indicator is off center i will have to roll level first by looking at the t-and-b indicator (but i won't know if i'm inverted or straight yet), then i will pull back on the stick a bit...if the altitude dial drops at a slower pace and i loose some speed i know i'm upright and can pull up and exit, if i pick up more speed and lose altitude faster i know i'm inverted so i roll 180 and pull up.

Compared to that the RAF fighters have a well equipped panel, making it a piece of cake to fly blind even without an artificial horizon once you learn to use the other instruments.

What you can do when the AH is tumbling and you want to fly blind is to combine the data from the turn and slip indicator with your climb rate dials. The climb rate dial saves you a lot of the guessing on whether you are inverted on not and as long as you are going up in any case it's good enough.
Should you find yourself lost in a cloud with a tumbling AH, just roll until the turn and slip indicator is centered and then pull up until you get no or positive climb rate. If by pulling back on the stick you get a negative reading on the vertical speed indicator you know you're inverted.

This is similar to the example with the 109, but the main difference is tha the VSI registers smaller changes than having to deduce everything yourself, so you don't have to yank the stick all over the place to realize what's happening and risk making it worse. The slightest amount of stick pressure will indicate a change in the VSI and you will know which way is up by that point: if back stick increases the VSI reading you are upright, if not you are inverted.


Try this as practice, start a free flight mission with clouds, disable any head-tracking equipment you might have and just look at the instrument panel, then take a piece of self-adhesive paper used for taking notes and tape it over your monitor to cover your artificial horizon. Now go in the clouds and fly around with the rest of the instruments, you'll see it's not that hard to get used to
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-17-2011, 03:44 PM
Pluto Pluto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
Pluto, in real life one wouldn't fly into a cloud without a very, very convincing reason!
Thanks for the answer but how about running away from a 109, would that be a convincing reason, Mr. combat-flight-teacher? I suppose that happened quite often!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-17-2011, 07:45 PM
Hunden Hunden is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: with your girl friend
Posts: 376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pluto View Post
Thanks for the answer but how about running away from a 109, would that be a convincing reason, Mr. combat-flight-teacher? I suppose that happened quite often!
still LMAO on that one............. Mr. combat-flight-teacher
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-18-2011, 08:03 AM
Pluto Pluto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 268
Default

... LMAO ???

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.