Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2011, 09:00 AM
scorpac scorpac is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 115
Default Landing gears to strong

Hello

i did some crashlandings on purpose to test the damage models, and found out that the landing gear is way to strong. the only damage i get from a 30-45° impact on the ground is some flat tyres. also my plane sometimes was just flipping back into the air.

The landing gear should break much easier.

settings Full Real ofc.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-01-2011, 03:04 PM
lion737 lion737 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Default

It is not only the landing gear. Ground has no bumps and no friction. Feels like an icefield.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-01-2011, 05:32 PM
Kianoni Kianoni is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lion737 View Post
It is not only the landing gear. Ground has no bumps and no friction. Feels like an icefield.
this was one of the things I really hated in IL2 and sadly it's still here in ClOD
..I mean the feeling of rolling over ice. maybe we should set up IL2-ClOD drift competitions.

Last edited by Kianoni; 04-01-2011 at 05:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-02-2011, 03:25 AM
drewpee drewpee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 427
Default

It used to be almost imposable to take off or land in a field in IL2. Most WW2 AC were designed to take off from grass fields so I guess undercarriages were pretty strong. I don't know but maybe they were under modeled in IL2 but we were all just used to it that way. I've seen plenty of film of AC bouncing hard on landing.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-02-2011, 07:51 AM
lion737 lion737 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drewpee View Post
It used to be almost imposable to take off or land in a field in IL2.
The FM of IL2 was just not accurate enough to simulate the landing more real. But I think they did what was possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drewpee View Post
Most WW2 AC were designed to take off from grass fields so I guess undercarriages were pretty strong.
Luftwaffe pilots were NOT allowed to land with gear extended on "unapproved" fields. That means, when they had to do an emergency landing ("Außenlandung" - outside aerodrome) , they had to do it with gear up ! (and engine off).
The reason: It was much to easy to go nose over. The plane and often the pilot as well would have been lost. After landing on the undercarriage (with engine shut) the repair was quite easy and the pilot survived often without injury.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drewpee View Post
I've seen plenty of film of AC bouncing hard on landing.
I am sure you did see no single film, where real WW2 planes did land on unapproved grass fields. They were bouncing on good prepared runways !

And this is perhaps the reason, why landings are not modelled more real. If 95 percent of the gamers would crash even on the airports, that would be somehow frustrating and not good for selling the game. In "Rise of Flight" the interaction with the ground is modelled much more accurate. But this is a "niche sim" with much smaller selling numbers. Most of the online gamers are RL pilots or PC sim enthusiasts with several hundred hours of training. And they often still damage their plane on landing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-02-2011, 08:08 AM
scissorss scissorss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 111
Default

I was also testing the strength of the tiger moth's landing gear earlier today. It is tough as nails apparently! I tried scraping it off on hills, slamming it HARD into the ground repeatedly, tearing it off via a farmhouse.. nothing seemed to work! Was fun trying though, and could see the wheel suspension in action.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-02-2011, 08:42 AM
palvas palvas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 31
Default

During my last "landing" i lost a tyre and after i stopped,the left leg of the gear landing slowly collapsed on itself.Wonderful effect
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-03-2011, 10:29 PM
JG1_Luckystrike JG1_Luckystrike is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 107
Default

Landing grear is in any case a bit to0 strong.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-05-2011, 06:10 PM
Flying Pencil Flying Pencil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lion737 View Post
Luftwaffe pilots were NOT allowed to land with gear extended on "unapproved" fields. That means, when they had to do an emergency landing ("Außenlandung" - outside aerodrome) , they had to do it with gear up ! (and engine off).
The reason: It was much to easy to go nose over. The plane and often the pilot as well would have been lost. After landing on the undercarriage (with engine shut) the repair was quite easy and the pilot survived often without injury.
The 109 had a notorious problem of snapped legs.
The strut was not only small, but it was at an angle, so it had a lot of side loads, and snaps.

Spitfire I think suffered snaps, but the Hurricane was solid.

Off top of my head, it is rarely mentioned in books.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-07-2011, 10:16 AM
Sternjaeger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the real issue seems to be within the shock absorbers IMHO. In a "patched" version of IL-2 I have the reworked FM for the BF109 which behaves properly, and trust me, the plane bounces around and torques on the landing gears like it's supposed to! Apparently the reason is a mistake in the FM coding, or so the guy explained me some time ago in " a certain other forum"

Let's hope they fix this.

Landing on a grassy field is VERY dangerous business, cos you never know what the ground is actually like (soft, bumpy, ditches etc..), that's why you should ALWAYS go for a wheels up landing outside a landing strip (unless you're using a road).

Tiger Moths landing gears are VERY rugged, in order to break one you will probably have to break the joints on the fuselage first!

Having said this, I've seen videos with Hurricanes literally bouncing off the ground with the gears down, that's definitely overmodelled..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.