|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
01-19-2011, 06:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I Want my 4.09 Spit FM's back.........
..............in 4.10 'to be released' fix patch! Pleeeze?..... otherwise I will throw my toys out of the pram! Launched a Dgen campaign for the Seafire this week (in 4.10) and the only thing it had in common with 4.09 is the variant....
|
|
#3
01-19-2011, 07:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm curious... What kind of testing have you done and what are the results. Your complaint is lacking any sort of detail.
|
|
#4
01-19-2011, 07:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Excessive trim needed as mentioned by others, engine performance is down, cornering speed and stall characteristics make it very twitchy compared to 4.09. In a nutshell it doesn't handle as well as in 4.09. I was so suprised that I launched the campaign in 4.09 to compare with 4.10 and it is very different! Why, after 10 years, was it necessary to change the FM of the Spits?
And pleeze......it's not a 'cissyfire' so no derogatory comments....... 
|
|
#5
01-19-2011, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I couldn't wait for this moment since years...
 And it's only the begin!!! Quote:
__________________
 A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
|
|
#7
01-19-2011, 07:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
PS: I'm joking...
__________________
A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
|
|
#9
01-19-2011, 07:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I dunno what the big deal is, I think they fly fine, The trim issue was discussed and data was shown that it is accurate in another thread. BTW for all the cissyfire people, SISSY is spelled with an S not a C, lol. Okay, now let the sissyfiring continue...
|
|
#10
01-19-2011, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Oh my gosh! Please I don't want those Spitfires again in CoD! I loved that beauty plane before "Oleg's Spitfire" in IL2... 
__________________
A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
