Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-25-2012, 04:59 PM
swat007 swat007 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Default i5 3570K or i5 2500K

About game performance in CLoD
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-25-2012, 05:11 PM
Anders_And Anders_And is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 247
Default

planning to overclock?´These are easily overclockable CPUs
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-25-2012, 05:47 PM
Madfish Madfish is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 423
Default

Single core performance is slightly higher. Overall I'd estimate some 7-10% gain over the 2600k.

DDR3 1600 support is kinda useless unless you're compressing files. As for gaming performance I'd rather get more RAM than faster ram. DDR3 1333 is totally fine. The gain from 1600 is way below 2% overall (various applications). In most games below 1% even.

PCIe3 support is also pretty much useless. Todays GPU's don't even profit much from PCIe2 over 1 so it's unlikely that there'll be much gain from 3.

This will probably be true even in 2013, when DDR4 might be introduced. The biggest pro the Ivy Bridge brings to the table is native USB3 and lower power consumption under load. You can save up to probably around 65% or so against a 2600k on a fine tuned system (undervolting)


All in all I'd say it depends on the budget. If you get a great deal on a 2600k go for it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-25-2012, 05:50 PM
NLS61 NLS61 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 218
Default

its tik vs tock the 3570 is a tick so its a smaller die 22nm.
is it better than a 2500k that depends it wil cost you less at beiing 77W TDP vs 95 W for 2500k.
if you are intrested in the Graphics than this a better chip its is atleast Dx11.
i've got the 2500K and it is completly sufficient for COD as it is now.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-25-2012, 06:05 PM
JG14_Jagr JG14_Jagr is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 433
Default

I Have a 2500 and the game runs great with my mobo auto OC'ing it to 4.2 Gig without an issue..
__________________
MSI P67A-65D
Intel i5 2500K @ 4.2 Gig
8 Gigs Corsair DDR3 1600 RAM
XFX 6970 Video Card
Win7 64 Bit Home Ed
ATI 12.3 Driver Package
WD Caviar 7600 RPM HDD
ATI CCC at DEFAULT settings
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-25-2012, 06:07 PM
Ailantd's Avatar
Ailantd Ailantd is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 290
Default

i7
__________________
Win 7 64
Quad core
4Gb ram
GTX 560
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-25-2012, 06:14 PM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Will definitely move to the new Ivy Bridge using Socket 1155 Sure the PCIe 3.0 does not give me any extra oompah, but at least my mobo will be fully utilized so to say
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-25-2012, 06:39 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

I must be the only person in the World who has had failures in OC on my board (2500K). I run it stock because I can't be bothered anymore, even a slight OC would cause a crash in game requiring a hard reset. It wasn't 'easy', I never saw any indication of overheating - due to this instability there's probably something else going on that I'd have to learn a pile of stuff about. Gutted when I constantly hear about people just jumping into BIOS, flicking a switch and hey-presto!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-25-2012, 07:06 PM
Zappatime Zappatime is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wakefield UK
Posts: 170
Default

See guru3d review of new ivy bridge cpus inc i5 3570K, lots of benchmarks against other cpus inc i5 2500K:

http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i...view-with-z77/
__________________
__________________________________________________ ________________________________
W7 64Bit/Q9650 @ 3.7Ghz/8Gb Ram/Gigabyte SuperOverClocked GTX580/Creative X-Fi/Dell Ultrascan 24" @ 1920x1200
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-25-2012, 07:21 PM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!


Osprey, your 2500K should easily go to 4GHz even with stock voltages. I did up my voltages just a tad to be sure and no problemos. I just changed CPU multiplier and did not touch the PCIE/CLK thing, left it at 100(default).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.