Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads
Reload this Page any word on spit performance after new beta?
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-06-2011, 09:47 AM
trumps trumps is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 221
Default any word on spit performance after new beta?
have any changes been made to the spit1 and 1a CEM and performance in the new beta? sounds like there might have been a few tweaks but only heard from the german side of things.

Cheers
Craig
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2011, 10:21 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default
Spit and Hurricanes Vne now in excess of 420MPH IAS ... yay

Hi speed regime for both RAF and axis fighters much more realistic.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2011, 10:47 AM
skouras skouras is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Greece-Athens
Posts: 1,171
Default
the bf 110 Can dive and exceed 500 Klm without overstresed
also the AI has not this terrible roll F16 style
much normal now
much more AI
Last edited by skouras; 10-06-2011 at 10:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2011, 11:02 AM
ReconNZ ReconNZ is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 114
Default
Dev's can you please confirm re the Spit II - do you think it is overmodeled against the 109's
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-06-2011, 11:14 AM
trumps trumps is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 221
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReconNZ View Post
Dev's can you please confirm re the Spit II - do you think it is overmodeled against the 109's
bud please don't turn this into another F$%kfest, this post is regarding the performance of the Mk1 and 1a, and if their performance and prop setup
had been sorted as i have only heard from fellow 109/110 flyers. i think after
all of the previous discussion it has generally been agreed upon that pretty
much all the other aircraft are/were under modeled as against the IIa being
over modeled.

Cheers
Craig
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-06-2011, 11:33 AM
ReconNZ ReconNZ is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 114
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumps View Post
bud please don't turn this into another F$%kfest, this post is regarding the performance of the Mk1 and 1a, and if their performance and prop setup
had been sorted as i have only heard from fellow 109/110 flyers. i think after
all of the previous discussion it has generally been agreed upon that pretty
much all the other aircraft are/were under modeled as against the IIa being
over modeled.

Cheers
Craig
Fair call Trumps, sorry mate, not trying to reignite the age old debate!

I heard a rumour that the Devs are going to post soon that they are happy with the respective plane models. Was just hoping my patch could encourage a response from them on the topic so that the disputes could be put to rest!

Happy for only the devs to respond, there are plenty of other threads for all of us to beat each other up on the old spit v 109 debate!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-06-2011, 11:53 AM
trumps trumps is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 221
Default
all good mate i don't spend a lot of time in the spit or hurri my self, usually prefer my E-1, or 110, but i would love to see the earlier spits at least running the correct props, lol at the moment they are running an aeronautical version of the old powerglide transmission !

Craig
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-06-2011, 12:33 PM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default
Anyone tested Spit IIa speed vs. 109 at ground level after the patch? Is 109 faster now by chance?

Need to know for balancing Repka servers.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2011, 01:17 PM
senseispcc senseispcc is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 598
Default
In some cases the hurricane was faster than the BF109 E but in combat the pilots did not ask even very politely witch type they did follow and shoot down. And the Hurricane was always faster than the Me110! For the Spitfire it was faster than the Bf109, sorry!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-06-2011, 05:42 PM
41Sqn_Stormcrow
Guest
  
Posts: n/a
Default
Yeah, anything new on this? We really would like to know if the FM issues are fixed.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Contact Us - Fulqrum Publishing s.r.o. - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.