Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2011, 08:29 AM
Mysticpuma's Avatar
Mysticpuma Mysticpuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 1,059
Default Nice video of the FW200C 4-Engine Luftwaffe aircraft



Click on the title in the Orange Bar above the video where it says Video not found, as it appears Liveleak don't allow hot-linking.

Cheers, MP
__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2yjr679.png

Last edited by Mysticpuma; 02-28-2011 at 12:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2011, 12:23 PM
Royraiden Royraiden is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 531
Default

Very Nice, had not seen this plane before but will be nice to see it in game.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2011, 01:28 PM
Zorin Zorin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
Default

I really do hope we will be able to fly the AI planes in CoD from external view like we can now in IL-2.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2011, 02:01 PM
Meusli Meusli is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
Default

What stopped the Luftwaffe from using more of these? Was it a philosophy problem or was it not really as good as allied strategic bombers. Also it looks like a up scaled He111 is that basically what it was?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2011, 02:31 PM
Jg2001_Rasputin Jg2001_Rasputin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 43
Default

The FW 200 is a converted civil long-range passenger/transport plane. It has nothing to do with the He 111. Btw the focus of the Luftwaffe in the early years never lay on strategic bombers.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2011, 03:20 PM
Kittle's Avatar
Kittle Kittle is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Bath, Maine. USA
Posts: 110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meusli View Post
What stopped the Luftwaffe from using more of these? Was it a philosophy problem or was it not really as good as allied strategic bombers. Also it looks like a up scaled He111 is that basically what it was?
The Fw-200 was not stressed for combat operations. In fact, many of them ended up with broken fuselages after landing, or having the wings fall off. It was not at all what was needed for the strategic bomber role. Had it been built for war and not as an airliner, it might have been the best maritime patrol aircraft of the war, with good payload and heavy defensive armament. As it was, there was never enough to go around, and IIRC only two units ever fielded the aircraft in full strength.

The He277 would have made a great bomber, if they had done away with the 177 earlier and focused on the traditional 4 engine 277 it may have made a difference, but I doubt the end would have been any different, just the death toll.

BTW - It is in IL2, AI only but it's there.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-28-2011, 05:59 PM
The Kraken The Kraken is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 317
Default

Beautiful plane, thanks for the video! As many converted airliner designs, the FW-200 wasn't suited too well for a combat role compared to a dedicated bomber design, except for patrol duty due to its exceptional range. Not sure I'd want to fly a full maritime patrol mission in real time though...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2011, 06:22 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Actually, the He111 was also used as a civilian transport and mail carrier to sidestep the restrictions of the Versailles treaty, so it's not really that strange seeing the Fw200 following a similar route.

The difference was that the 111 was probably designed from the start as a combat aircraft and disguised as a civilian one, while the Fw200 was a genuinely civilian airliner pressed into military service for lack of other alternatives.

The reason that the luftwaffe lacked strategic heavies is usually attributed to the way the air force was used under the blitzkrieg doctrine, a mostly tactical tool to support the advance of a mechanized ground army.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-28-2011, 07:23 PM
rivalsavages rivalsavages is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Default True War Story

My father served on sloop HMS Starling during the Battle of the Atlantic and he told me a preposterous story about an incident where Johnnie Walker, the ship's Captain complained about how the convoy was being shadowed. Apparently the tactic of the Condors was to circle clockwise out of reach of Anti Aircraft Fire for hours at a time.

Walker apparently got his morse code operator to send a message to the Condor. It read "You are making us dizzy. Could you fly round in the opposite direction please?"

Astoundingly, back came the reply "Anything to oblige!" and the Condor turned and flew in an anti clockwise direction for the rest of the afternoon!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-28-2011, 10:33 PM
BadAim BadAim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 984
Default

LOL! That one puts a humorous twist on a not-so funny reality. Even though there were rarely more than 40 Condors in service at any given time, with only 20 or so actually flyable, they were a deadly menace to the convoys.

When used properly as a long range patrol aircraft, they proved more than adequate, in spite of their being of poor construction for military use. I suspect the laughs were over for rivalsavage's father and his mates when said condor was done marshaling in a Wolf pack. (I'm glad he survived)

Hermann Goring put paid to the program though when he sent them all to Stalingrad for the airlift operations (for which they were utterly useless) loosing every one. They were never again available in sufficient numbers to be effective.
__________________
I'm pretty much just here for comic relief.
Q6600@3.02 GHz, 4gig DDR2, GTX470, Win7 64bit
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.