View Single Post
  #26  
Old 05-14-2010, 08:13 PM
KnightFandragon KnightFandragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KRL HQ, Ontario Canada
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikitns View Post
first of all, Germans in 1944-1945 had severe problems with rare materials, so I seriously doubt they had better ammo. So the rare rounds should NOT be used when comparing guns. Wikipedia says 185mm penetration at 1000m. I would assume that is @90 of straight steel, but it is of unknown quality. Then there is battlefield.ru saying 95 mm sloped at @60 at 150mm...

Very well, it is not as good as King Tiger (but it shouldn't have 180mm frontal armour, but 150mm as that guy above said) but better than Panther and Tiger I.
The Germans had problems w/ the rare mat's to make the rare rounds to being with. Those rare rounds were rare period.
Reply With Quote