Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilsausage
"I never said I have never played COH online, only rarely."
Well true but you judged it only by its single player. Why? Cuz it has a campaign?
I mean seriously take Starcraft for example. It had a really complex campaign for its time. But starcraft isnt exactly known for that now is it?
"4. If that logic was there, we would never need a new improved game, because they are all basically the same, from the time the first Warcraft game came to the rts scene and maybe earlier."
That was not the point i was trying to make. Theres a hugh different between that and a game that is made almost exactly as CoH.
And you don't even have any real arguments on why CoH is bad. Except that it isnt good in single player. Which we already know!
"I need content, I need strategic options in my games so that I can put my mind to work."
Good because in answering threads you don't really seam to "put your mind to work".
|
Like a stuck record you simply don't get it. So let me repeat for the umpteenth time.
1.I play mostly single player and in that COH is simply not realistic enough for me. When I play multiplayer I play games like Dawn of war and Warhammer because they were designed mainly for multiplayer. They have several little nuances that make them perfect for multiplayer. But I don't play multiplayer that often so I am not a good judge of it.
2. I never said COH was bad, it is simply an arcade game and I am tired of those games. Is calling a game an arcade game an insult? If so there are many other games that fall into that category.
3. I don't consider COH a leap in improvement over the original Warcraft. It is basically the same game, but flashier graphics. But that does not mean I am calling COH a bad game, Warcraft was one my favorite games.
4. Are you some personal representative of COH that you are taking it so personally. If you like arcade games, well and good, what is wrong with that.