Thread: Plane Ratings
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 09-07-2009, 02:49 PM
H Lecter H Lecter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mondo View Post
Almost all the Spits were actually quite slow (at all heights as well) compared with what they fought and quite poor accelerators. The P51D and the 190's have much better acceleration and top speed at all heights.

You'd probably be also shocked that the main ground attack aircraft used by the RAF in 1944/45 was the Spitfire IX.
Slower and worse accelerating than a JU-87? I only referred to this comparison and I know that the Spit is not really fast.

I'm not shocked at all, and you will agree that a JU-87 is a better bomber than a Spitfire
Reply With Quote