Thread: Tracers or not?
View Single Post
  #10  
Old 06-10-2009, 02:54 PM
334th_Rakkasan 334th_Rakkasan is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Speaking as a former Infantryman for five and a half years, the most realistic tracer effects come from the Russian MG's. Allthough they are too bright in the daytime. They also look to "bloby", the rounds phosphorus trail should look longer, more like a streak than a blob.

Some of the "modded" tracer effects I have seen are laughable. Looking like old captures from WWII gun cam footage. For the reasons many others have mentioned, camera shake etc.. Tracers do not look like white corcksrews sailing through the air.
Sorry to go off topic, I agree that the primary reason not to use tracers is to keep the enemy from knowing you are shooting at him. I can't quote anything I have read regarding the topic, yet I have read (or heard on documentaries) many American Aces prefering not to use tracers.

Last edited by 334th_Rakkasan; 06-10-2009 at 02:59 PM.
Reply With Quote