Same here, Ice, but I think this time we (the players and Maddox Games) need to work out a standardized system for such data input which relieves Maddox Games from inaccurate, incomplete and/or "amateurish" input. It doesn't help to say "Plane X is off. Author Q quotes Ace K in his book Y saying ..." as this is anecdotal stuff and useless. We need to make sure Maddox Games gets this stuff as complete as it gets - including data which might contradict the other data. But if we exclude stuff we don't like for reasons of personal bias then how much of an accurate simulation do we really want?
|