
12-24-2008, 05:22 PM
|
Approved Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 95
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Former_Older
Couple of observations:
6000m. Are you sure that the modeling of high altitude, not the aircraft, is the issue?
You seem to assume that both aircraft were being flown correctly
Also, have you ever considered that any simulation has limitations? Buying "real data" seems to be your solution. Where is this "real data" warehouse? It is very easy to point out failings in anything, the challenge is to find the faults and the ways to correct them, or different approaches to solve the problems. You do neither. You complain, proclaim things as wrong as if you know everything and can decide what's right and wrong, and then offer nothing but a request for a fix
To create a 'perfect' simulation of anything, first a "perfect" simulation of the real world needs to be modeled. Only then can a proper simulation of anything be produced. This simulation, despite it's improvements, is eight years old. The developer cannot be expected to provide support and improvements to the product forever. Do you understand that? The developer has ceased support of this simulation because they are developing a better one. The intention is to provide a more perfect simulation- but not by improving this one. You cannot just 'buy better data', plug it into the sim, and make the sim better.
Your complaints may be very valid, but you are literally years late in voicing them
|
But you think the new simulation SOW could be more perfect than Il2 sturmovik 1946?. I think with the new simulation this situation happend again.
|