Thread: Ta-152c
View Single Post
  #41  
Old 12-17-2008, 04:28 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brain32 View Post
Yes but it lost the blade because the airscrew could not absorb the added power, it may go over to the engine via blade damage but the source of damage is the boost...

Because they showed that SabreIIb couldn't bear the burden of higher boost, so the did change to Rotol airscrew, but he mentions not if that was a succsess or another failure, we don't know.

Why should I? I don't believe that myself anyway, same way I don't believe in +13lbs Tempest used operationally
Just love your logic Brain. Did the extra boost directly cause rod, bearing or other engine component failures? NO!

Your quote of F/O Ronald Dennis of 56 Sqn says 13lb boost was used operationally.
Reply With Quote