Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire
It would be nice to at least have ShKAS as an option on the Type 24 if not the default with ShVAK as the addition.
|
main changes was only weapon (this written in final description of types), so, in fact, yes, especially if in game problem with old single missions (heard something like this) and if game can change performance if you selected other weapon for type 24, for example (like yak-9m with/without ns-37)...
and need reworking of FM of i-16, i think, now in game not so obviously what aircraft was not very stable in flight, this can effect when pilot shoots at long distance...
ofcourse, it's only my opinion, maybe in something wrongly...
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoasel
Who gets to decide what planes were historically worn out and/or poorly maintained?
|
these old planes sometimes are really needed, for example, soviet spit-5, hurri, i-16 in 44, repaired FW-190А-2,3 from 15(sp)./JG51 in 43 etc etc etc, we all - i mean we players, DT etc - have info mainly not very accurate, of course, so, need lot of researches for all sides and, of course, at first we need correct normal planes...
about quality, i can say about soviet planes, we have some info and correct approach to these problems can give more historically correct performance (i try explain this in one topic here, how can, maybe DT reading this)...
anyway, at first, i repeat, need normal all main planes with performance within 2-3 % tolerance and all this it's lot of work...
Quote:
Same for random inflight failures... Flying online for 20min towards objective just to see my engine fails?  Why should I do that?
|
here i agree with you, it's a very old game (at this moment personally i can't have fun only if done something in this game, we need new sim and these features mainly for him), we must have choice, plus, all these various failures, defects of bombs etc require lot of complex researches what i think not deal even for big experienced team...
Quote:
Originally Posted by RegRag1977
Another thing that could be corrected easily is the location of oil smoke for La7: it appears exactly there where the La5 radiator would be. Problem is that La5 and La7 cannot share common location for the smoke effect since the La7 had its radiator located far behind under the fuselage and not directly under the Ash82 engine as is now.
|
hmm, maybe, it's not SO wrongly, when i read about p-51, remembered, what la-7 have similar oil system, so, slightly larger area of damage...