Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES
It is not age based at all.. It has more to do with 'what you do' in life.. Take me for example, a basic engineering job allows me enough disposable income and time to pay to play with several dependants, dogs, and bills in general
That is to say
We should not force game makers to cater to the lowest common denominator!
|
It's not a question of money: X dollars a month won't make or break most peoples' budgets.
It's a question of time: If I was in my 60s and retired I'd have all sorts of free time to play video games and still do enough around the house to avoid pissing my wife off.
I can afford the game
financially but if I were to get busy and not have time to play then I'd be getting charged for not playing the game and not getting my money's worth.
I play sports, I ski, I go out for dinner/movie nights, etc etc etc. Why would I voluntarily accept being charged money for time I spend not playing the game?
Quote:
Put another way, I don't want to play a flight sim that any starbucks baristas can afford! 
|
Meh, that's elitist. I'm not one to dismiss someone based on how much money they make or where they work.