Corporal::
Quote:
|
It stuffs up as an Operating System because it uses DirectX to render the entier GUI, which uses more RAM, more CPU and requires that you have a 'DirectX compatible' video-card, the only up-side area of Vista is when you are a system administrator, you have more control (as in Security Options, ect...).
|
I heard about that. A low cost computer can use an integrated motherboard video for non-grafix intensive applications, and be used at low cost by many including businesses, but Vista itself is a grafix intensive "operating system" forcing high video costs on everyone. Is this Correct Thinking? Or would Vista have some option of doing away with the bloated grafix UI?