Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES
Wilco!
So in summary..
Thus far..
NO ONE has been able to come up with one valid 'broken promise' (where valid = doing step 1 and step 2 of the challange)
Strange when you stop and consider how many references are made to 'broken promises' on a daliy bases in this forum..
You would think someone could provide one!
I mean if it was true.. And there were dozens upon dozens of 'broken promises' than it should be a simple mater to list at least one if not a half dozen
But I digress!
All in all thanks for proving my point! S!
|
I agree....people would have a valid argument for using a "Promise" for features listed on the BOX cover, or official release website, but there are few of those listed. The vast majority of the posts that proclaim broken promises in the forums were never made by the developer. The developer has stated that this is a WIP and features would be added as game and system resources allowed thru the life of the series.
The developer has just now made the sim playable with minimal features working, and it will be sometime before we see all the features working as we would hope. COD for obvious reasons hasn't been financially successful enough to support further work, but the good news is the investors still seem to be willing to support the series at least until the Sequels release.
The standalone COD is almost dead, but the Channel map should live on with "promised" feature improvements and additions by the devs and community through the life of the Sequels, "IF" the next Sequel is successful enough to help support further development. There is still a chance we will eventually see a much improved IL-2 1946 on the new game engine.