
09-30-2012, 11:42 AM
|
Approved Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adonys
first of all, re-introducing bugs you've already solved in previous versions shows very, very bad code knowledge, programming or versioning control. most probably all of them.
secondly, they does not look like they weren't testing anything, they were simply not tested anything. they've just thrown together the last version they had on their subversion, and that was it.
as a third point, don't you imagine CoD is a different branch in the code than BoM. Considering they will work together, it is the same base code, which means what we see right now in CoD is exactly the state in which BoM is too. Which is nothing short of disastrous. Their "pace" of fixing things, more than one year and a half after release is almost zero. For God's sake, other companies are making a whole new product, from the scratch, within this period of time. they were not able to just fix some simple things.
I can not see how this might work for BoM, no matter how hard, or from which angle I'm trying to look at it.
At this point, a realistic expectation would be to expect them fixing anything they can at this crawling rate (with many previously working things getting broken) until they'll have to close the business for good, most probably at the time the BoM sale results will come in. And the optimistic one would be to have them release the code, so that we can work on it by ourselves.
As MJ said, this is it!
|
|