Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp
It is all about maintaining optimum pitch and rpm.
As you coarsen the pitch to reacquire the rpm, you will notice an increase in performance.
In the quoted cases, they are setting the engine to a limited over boost and coarsening the pitch to maintain rpm.
That is how it works.
|
Ok..
So on one had we have Crumpp telling us that is how it works, that the 109 pilots coarsen the pitch to
maintain the RPM..
So we have an opinion of a modern day civilian trained pilot some 70 years after the fact as to how the 109 pilots did it..
But we also have the following..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulrich Steinhilper
When we flew at that height, the engine only just gave enough pull and we constantly changed the propeller pitch and RPM to improve the performance. With a flat pitch we could increase the RPM of the engine and get more pressure from the super-charger. Then, by changing the pitch to a coarser setting, we could make up some speed.
|
Ok..
So we have Ulrich Steinhilper telling us that is how it works, that the 109 pilots constantly changed the propeller pitch and RPM to improve the performance..
So we have the opinion of an actual WWII military trained pilot as to how the 109 pilots did it..
Which is in conflict of how Crumpp said 109 pilots did it..
So at this point there is no need for any further discussion or debate..
Both sides have spoken!
A) Crumpp a modern civilian trained pilot
B) Steinhilper an actual WWII military trained pilot
Thus the only thing left to do is decide who do you want to belive
Crumpp or Steinhilper
For me the choice is simple
Steinhilper hands down!