View Single Post
  #170  
Old 09-18-2012, 05:01 AM
camber camber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Not sure you understand much of the science at all. I certainly don't like the attitude or implication I have something to prove or a vested interest in the outcome.

The math is what it is.....
math is math, and physics is physics.

But coding useful models is a different animal. Part of my job is coding physical process simulations. Providing you have implemented the correct maths, your output depends on the physical constants you choose as appropriate.

Perhaps if you listed the constant values you used for the Spit and 109 we could evaluate your graph a little better. The math equations would be good too.

camber
Reply With Quote