Which from the minute amount of this information I followed before - I thought as much...
Shame.
However hopefully we can come to some kind of accord and present the data to 1c:MG...
This is the part where we must choose what I would call "Folklore" (eye witness accounts) and "facts" actual graphs... I dont see how you can truely have purley one or the other and I think this is where the real nitty gritty arguments break out... So with an open mind I am finding myself more in the "feeling" group than the facts but with a balance of both.
We can have all the facts nailed on the head like ROC and TAS but as you say we are still guessing the rest which is where "folklore" fills the gap... However then we are down to the spit always out turns the 109 and vice versa... - from pilot accounts...
So, its a mine field...
Should we try to get 1c:MG nail the "fact" figures as close as possible and then the "pilot account" things like turn and roll?
This is my first forray into a FM debate... So forgive the open mindedness and lack of direction.
S!
|