Quote:
Originally Posted by adonys
well, carmack just stopped and shared his efforts with Occulus project, and became a support of it. and from what he said at latest Quakecon, it has the FoV, resolution (mostly) and latency he needed and wanted to achieve.
have you seen his 3h keynote from the Quakecon? we'll talk after that..
|
It does not have the latency or framerate. (110fps+)
He said that he now feels that FOV is the (obviously) more important factor to get immersed though - a ton cheaper to achieve as well.
That aside it doesn't change anything about what I said... Occulus is still a fake company to me and it smells fishier than fish. I just hope it won't become the next TrackIR, an absurdely lame company which has kept us from seeing better devices for years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt255
I really can't understand all this negativity in this topic about that. The current implementation is obviously not great (unless you have a 3D screen or whatever), so why not have atleast the option to get something like in gynoflyer shot. For all the leaners or strap tighteners, they can leave this in as the default or whatever.
|
Even with a 3D screen or HMD - currently the targeting reticles are bugged as far as I've tested and heard.