@ Galway...
you're correct, but as I offered; it is both the upside and downside of the judiciary. and you've reinforced that.
An Act is written and (assuming) passed.
Someone has application to have that challenged (tested) in court.
That challenge is based on the wording of the Act being challenged
The Judiciary bases their judgement of the challenge on the arguments presented for and against. (as well as any political/ social bias they may personally hold)
If the Act is of a clear cut wording (most roads rules for instance)... it cannot be "interpreted".
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4
Stand alone Collector's Edition
DCS Series
Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound.
|