
07-30-2012, 05:45 PM
|
Approved Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw
You miss the forest for the trees. The point is that fully automatic weapons are a statistical non-entity in crime. Harping on the subject, as some do, merely highlights one's ignorance of the true situation
See above.
Once again, forest for the trees. If absolute numbers are the only criteria for determining increased regulation then firearms should be relegated pretty low on the list.
"Most people..."???? What about the ones that aren't in your, "most" category? What about the ones that were killed, raped, permanently injured, scarred (emotionally or physically), etc?
I don't feel the need to die so that, "most", people won't.
If you want to be a victim, fine, that's your choice, but don't force me to be one.
Continuing the trend...forest for the trees.
My only point is that the statistics are purposely skewed for shock value and the studies are purposely designed to mislead.
On a related note, including adult suicides is so beyond asinine it can't even be described. If an adult wants to off themselves, that's their decision and they should be allowed to do so.
I think it's pretty obvious that I was arguing gun crime only. Regardless, common sense should not have to rely on lies and misrepresentation.
IMHO, lies and misrepresentation should be left to the ignorant morons (on both sides of gun control).
--Outlaw.
|
Wow, you are one scared guy. Best example yet why your societiy is in shambles if it prodcues people who only feel save if they can cling to a firearm.
|