View Single Post
  #6  
Old 07-15-2012, 04:08 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
...and change COD's development style to ROF's, in which we had to pay more often for planes and extras,
I think that would be a smart move.. It is the future of games that are not as popular (sales) as other games, and flight sims falls into that catagory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
but guaranteed COD would be working as well as ROF is now with everything fixed, bug free, clouds, trees, weather, sound, extra planes, net code and campaigns ...everything.
So let me see if I understand you correctly..

When you say 'working as well as RoF' your saying less bugs is aceptable?

If so glad to hear you admit it!

Because truth be told RoF is NOT without issues!

The current RoF versions has a few nasty bugs in it, the most noticeable one being the sound bug, where it forces you to leave the online server and restart the software.

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Would you have gladly payed...lets say... £100?
I have allready spent more than that on RoF and I don't regret one penny of it! RoF is a great sim and alot of fun.. But as noted above it is not perfect! When you take into account that RoF has been out (released) a good year before CoD and what with the 777 buy out, they have had more 'time' and 'money' to fix the bugs in RoF..

Yet they have not fixxed them all! Something the peeps in this forum should take note of the next time they compare RoF to CoD.

That is to say check back in a year and after a CoD sequal and see which flight sim you like better!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote