View Single Post
  #10  
Old 06-27-2012, 08:06 AM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

I do not think 1C has any agenda against RAF in particular. This CoD suffers from same bugs/features in FM than it's predecessor. Recall altitude performances and such? It all has been ported to CoD and now they are fixing it what has been mostly fixed by community and Team Daidalos in original IL-2 Really, blaming now the game maker that they have an agenda against RAF? Made my day for laughs. Having an imperfect/flawed/buggy FM/DM/CEM engine has nothing to do with RAF/LW/VVS or any other air force Luthier could model any plane to the last detail and still any of you pro-blue/red afficiandos would be whining that it is not correct.

This thread is yet another reason why I do not even bother to read anything else here than maybe Screenshots, Performance etc. as always the same accounted names are name calling, putting them selves above everyone else and being the gods of information and of course always right. This goes to both camps equally. Banana forum is not far from UBI Zoo anymore. Flight simming is a niche already and this blue vs red thing has kept MANY people I know out from it as they do not want to bother after reading a few threads like this or similar.

So please go ahead and whine of ground breaking flaws like the Spitfire seat is wrong colour or Bf109E cockpit hood has wrong sized nuts in it..Really feeling fed up with this all going on here as EVERY SINGLE thread that COULD be a fountain of information for everyone turns to a ePeen slapping contest between certain individuals and their sidekicks..and I mean ALWAYS the same ones regardless the favored side they have. MEH!
Reply With Quote