Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp
|
So how does the Merlin XX data you posted above support your 21 s claim?
The Merlin XX is what the RAE refer to in their report R&M 2349 as well. So you both use the same engine data but come to different conclusions.
Why do you agree on the low level results but come to different conclusions for 20,000 ft performance?
Remember the RAE result is that the Spitfire will sustain a loadfactor of n=1.57 (bank angle 51 degress) and turn time 31s at 20,000ft. You get sustainable loadfactor n=2.70 (bank angle 68 degress) and turn time 21s at 20,000ft. Both results refer to the same engine so please explain.
BTW: I note that while you are quick to question other peoples competence and credentials you have not provided anything of substance yourself to back up your claims and it's faily obvious you have nothing to show so I wont press you any more on that.